Here's a modern family dilemma that has nothing to do with blended families learning to love each other and everything to do with money, boundaries, and what happens when grown adults refuse to support themselves.

A woman recently posted to Reddit's r/AITAH community asking if she was in the wrong for delivering an ultimatum to her husband: either his unemployed son and son-in-law stay out, or she walks out. The two men in question—her 47-year-old stepson and his 60-year-old husband—have no jobs, no income, and just got kicked out of the husband's ex-wife's house. Without asking his current wife first, her husband promised them a room.

"I told my husband in so many words that he can either have his son in his house or a wife and partner to grow old with," she wrote. "He just says he cannot see his son turned out in the streets."

Reddit did not hold back.

The Internet Picks a Side

Thousands of commenters rallied behind the woman, agreeing she had every right to set boundaries in her own home. This wasn't about being cruel to family—it was about protecting herself from two grown men who have shown zero interest in financial independence.

"No one wants unemployed adults mooching in their home," one top comment read, racking up over 4,500 upvotes.

Another person spelled out the long-term nightmare scenario: "Once they move in, they will never leave and you and your husband will have to support them for the rest of your natural life."

The comment section filled with horror stories about relatives who moved in temporarily and stayed for years. One person described a family member who arrived saying "just until I get back on my feet." Eight years later, they were still there. Still not on their feet, presumably.

Protect Your Assets First

The advice turned practical fast. Multiple commenters urged the woman to speak with a divorce lawyer and get her financial house in order before making any moves. Leaving the home prematurely, they warned, could jeopardize her claim to marital assets.

"DO NOT LEAVE! Get a good divorce attorney, file for divorce and force the sale of the house," one person advised. Another chimed in: "Start separating out your finances. Open up a bank account in a different bank."

Several people flagged the husband's behavior as the real red flag here. "He didn't ask you, discuss with you, mention it to you. At all. Until after the fact," someone pointed out. "These two leeches will bleed you dry."

The consensus was clear: bringing anyone into a shared home should be a "two yes, one no" decision. If either spouse objects, the answer is no. Period.

Why Aren't Two Grown Men Working?

One question kept coming up: why exactly are a 47-year-old and a 60-year-old unable to support themselves?

"Are they disabled?" one person asked. If not, another commenter suggested, "they can work at a gas station and earn enough to rent a one-bedroom or an efficiency for themselves."

Someone else summed it up bluntly: "What an insane way for them to be living at 47 and 60. Like… get your sh*t together 25-35 years ago."

A few commenters tried to defend the husband, arguing it was harsh to force a parent to choose between their spouse and their child. But most disagreed. This wasn't about a child in need—it was about two adults who've been enabled for years and are now looking for their next sponsor.

"You deserve to enjoy your home, not be stressed out by incompatibility," one person wrote. "You have every right to set boundaries and not shift them."

And perhaps the most memorable line: "There are no bums without sponsors."

The woman hasn't posted an update yet, but the message from the internet is loud and clear: don't sacrifice your financial security and peace of mind for people who won't help themselves. Even if they're family.