Marketdash
Back to News

Citron's Bitcoin-MicroStrategy Bet Pays Off Big One Year Later

MarketDash Editorial Team
16 days ago
Andrew Left's Citron Research went long Bitcoin and short MicroStrategy a year ago, betting the company's premium had gotten out of hand. The trade worked spectacularly, with Strategy shares down 68% while Bitcoin fell just 15%.

Sometimes timing really is everything. A year ago, short seller Andrew Left and his firm Citron Research made a contrarian call that raised eyebrows: go long Bitcoin (BTC), but short Strategy Inc. (MSTR), the company formerly known as MicroStrategy. Now Citron is taking a well-deserved victory lap.

The Setup: Betting Against the Bitcoin Evangelist

Citron Research, perhaps best known for its disastrous bet against GameStop years ago, announced its position in November 2024. The thesis was straightforward: Strategy's stock price had "completely detached from BTC fundamentals," according to Left's tweet at the time.

Left wasn't dismissing the company entirely. He actually hedged his criticism with respect, saying "Much respect to @saylor, but even he must know $MSTR is overheated." Michael Saylor, the former CEO and current executive chairman, has become the face of corporate Bitcoin accumulation, turning Strategy into essentially a leveraged Bitcoin play wrapped in a software company.

The immediate market reaction was brutal. Strategy shares plummeted over 16% on the day Citron announced the short position, marking the stock's worst single-day performance in months. On that day, Strategy traded between $371.84 and $543.00, while Bitcoin hovered between $94,132.60 and $99,014.22.

The Results: A Spectacular Divergence

Fast forward one year, and the numbers tell a striking story. Strategy shares have cratered 68% over the past year, while Bitcoin has declined just 15%. Even more telling, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), which tracks the S&P 500, gained 11.0% during the same period.

In 2025 alone, the divergence continues. Strategy is down 41.5% year-to-date, Bitcoin has fallen 8.8%, and the S&P 500 ETF is up 13.1%. Citron's assessment of the situation? "Proud of the timing – and grateful for the luck that always plays a part."

That's refreshingly honest for a firm celebrating a winning trade. Left acknowledged that while skill matters, luck played its role too.

The Thesis: Too Many Ways to Own Bitcoin

Citron's bet wasn't really about Bitcoin's prospects. It was about whether Strategy deserved the premium it commanded over simply owning Bitcoin directly. The answer, according to the market over the past year, has been a resounding no.

"With Bitcoin investing easier than ever (ETFs, $COIN, $HOOD), MSTR's volume has completely detached from BTC fundamentals," Citron said a year ago. The point was simple: Why pay a premium for Strategy when you can buy Bitcoin ETFs or purchase crypto directly through platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood?

Years ago, Strategy was one of the few publicly traded ways to get Bitcoin exposure, especially for investors who wanted it in traditional portfolios or retirement accounts. That made the company a unique vehicle worth a premium. But the landscape changed dramatically with the approval of Bitcoin ETFs and expanded crypto access through mainstream brokers.

Citron had actually been bullish on Strategy dating back to 2020, calling it "the ultimate way to invest in Bitcoin" when alternatives were scarce. But as the market evolved, so did the thesis.

Saylor's Defense: The Volatility Machine

Michael Saylor pushed back hard against the short thesis when it first emerged. In a CNBC interview a year ago, he attempted to explain Strategy's business model beyond simply holding Bitcoin.

"I think a lot of people don't understand our core business," Saylor said. "We're a Bitcoin treasury company." His explanation centered on the idea that Strategy makes money by "selling the volatility and recycling it back into Bitcoin."

The math, according to Saylor, worked like this: The company was borrowing at 6% while Bitcoin was expected to appreciate 29% annually or more. "The thesis of the shorts is if the premium and the equity disappears, we can't make money," he said, arguing that Strategy was essentially "selling dollar bills for $3" and could become one of the most profitable companies in America.

"If you like Bitcoin, then this is a monster for you," Saylor concluded.

In his anniversary tweet celebrating the trade, Left admitted he still doesn't understand what Saylor was describing. The market, it seems, has sided with Left's confusion. Investors have increasingly questioned whether Strategy's complex financial engineering justifies the premium when simpler Bitcoin exposure exists.

Looking Forward

The trade has vindicated both parts of Citron's thesis. First, Bitcoin has massively outperformed Strategy shares. Second, the premium investors were willing to pay for Strategy over direct Bitcoin exposure has evaporated as alternatives proliferated.

Strategy remains a software company with a legacy business, but it's really betting everything on Bitcoin's future appreciation while using leverage and financial instruments to amplify returns. Whether that model works long-term may depend on whether Bitcoin can deliver the consistent returns Saylor projects and whether investors ever again value the wrapper Strategy provides around those holdings.

For now, Citron is enjoying being right. And in the world of short selling, where being right too early can be just as painful as being wrong, timing really does matter.

Back to News

Citron's Bitcoin-MicroStrategy Bet Pays Off Big One Year Later

MarketDash Editorial Team
16 days ago
Andrew Left's Citron Research went long Bitcoin and short MicroStrategy a year ago, betting the company's premium had gotten out of hand. The trade worked spectacularly, with Strategy shares down 68% while Bitcoin fell just 15%.

Sometimes timing really is everything. A year ago, short seller Andrew Left and his firm Citron Research made a contrarian call that raised eyebrows: go long Bitcoin (BTC), but short Strategy Inc. (MSTR), the company formerly known as MicroStrategy. Now Citron is taking a well-deserved victory lap.

The Setup: Betting Against the Bitcoin Evangelist

Citron Research, perhaps best known for its disastrous bet against GameStop years ago, announced its position in November 2024. The thesis was straightforward: Strategy's stock price had "completely detached from BTC fundamentals," according to Left's tweet at the time.

Left wasn't dismissing the company entirely. He actually hedged his criticism with respect, saying "Much respect to @saylor, but even he must know $MSTR is overheated." Michael Saylor, the former CEO and current executive chairman, has become the face of corporate Bitcoin accumulation, turning Strategy into essentially a leveraged Bitcoin play wrapped in a software company.

The immediate market reaction was brutal. Strategy shares plummeted over 16% on the day Citron announced the short position, marking the stock's worst single-day performance in months. On that day, Strategy traded between $371.84 and $543.00, while Bitcoin hovered between $94,132.60 and $99,014.22.

The Results: A Spectacular Divergence

Fast forward one year, and the numbers tell a striking story. Strategy shares have cratered 68% over the past year, while Bitcoin has declined just 15%. Even more telling, the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY), which tracks the S&P 500, gained 11.0% during the same period.

In 2025 alone, the divergence continues. Strategy is down 41.5% year-to-date, Bitcoin has fallen 8.8%, and the S&P 500 ETF is up 13.1%. Citron's assessment of the situation? "Proud of the timing – and grateful for the luck that always plays a part."

That's refreshingly honest for a firm celebrating a winning trade. Left acknowledged that while skill matters, luck played its role too.

The Thesis: Too Many Ways to Own Bitcoin

Citron's bet wasn't really about Bitcoin's prospects. It was about whether Strategy deserved the premium it commanded over simply owning Bitcoin directly. The answer, according to the market over the past year, has been a resounding no.

"With Bitcoin investing easier than ever (ETFs, $COIN, $HOOD), MSTR's volume has completely detached from BTC fundamentals," Citron said a year ago. The point was simple: Why pay a premium for Strategy when you can buy Bitcoin ETFs or purchase crypto directly through platforms like Coinbase and Robinhood?

Years ago, Strategy was one of the few publicly traded ways to get Bitcoin exposure, especially for investors who wanted it in traditional portfolios or retirement accounts. That made the company a unique vehicle worth a premium. But the landscape changed dramatically with the approval of Bitcoin ETFs and expanded crypto access through mainstream brokers.

Citron had actually been bullish on Strategy dating back to 2020, calling it "the ultimate way to invest in Bitcoin" when alternatives were scarce. But as the market evolved, so did the thesis.

Saylor's Defense: The Volatility Machine

Michael Saylor pushed back hard against the short thesis when it first emerged. In a CNBC interview a year ago, he attempted to explain Strategy's business model beyond simply holding Bitcoin.

"I think a lot of people don't understand our core business," Saylor said. "We're a Bitcoin treasury company." His explanation centered on the idea that Strategy makes money by "selling the volatility and recycling it back into Bitcoin."

The math, according to Saylor, worked like this: The company was borrowing at 6% while Bitcoin was expected to appreciate 29% annually or more. "The thesis of the shorts is if the premium and the equity disappears, we can't make money," he said, arguing that Strategy was essentially "selling dollar bills for $3" and could become one of the most profitable companies in America.

"If you like Bitcoin, then this is a monster for you," Saylor concluded.

In his anniversary tweet celebrating the trade, Left admitted he still doesn't understand what Saylor was describing. The market, it seems, has sided with Left's confusion. Investors have increasingly questioned whether Strategy's complex financial engineering justifies the premium when simpler Bitcoin exposure exists.

Looking Forward

The trade has vindicated both parts of Citron's thesis. First, Bitcoin has massively outperformed Strategy shares. Second, the premium investors were willing to pay for Strategy over direct Bitcoin exposure has evaporated as alternatives proliferated.

Strategy remains a software company with a legacy business, but it's really betting everything on Bitcoin's future appreciation while using leverage and financial instruments to amplify returns. Whether that model works long-term may depend on whether Bitcoin can deliver the consistent returns Saylor projects and whether investors ever again value the wrapper Strategy provides around those holdings.

For now, Citron is enjoying being right. And in the world of short selling, where being right too early can be just as painful as being wrong, timing really does matter.