Marketdash
Back to News

Wharton's Jeremy Siegel Says Trump Tariff Exemptions Create 'Court of Donald Trump' Instead of Free Markets

MarketDash Editorial Team
12 days ago
Finance professor Jeremy Siegel criticizes Trump's tariff exemption process as fundamentally anti-capitalist, though he believes deregulation and tax policies are offsetting the damage to markets.

When you're known as the "Wizard of Wharton," people tend to listen when you critique economic policy. And Jeremy Siegel, the renowned finance professor, isn't holding back on President Donald Trump's approach to trade.

The Problem With Presidential Exemptions

In a recent appearance on the Icons and Ideas podcast with Peter Mallouk, Siegel took aim at what he sees as a fundamental flaw in the current tariff structure: the exemption process itself.

"I don't particularly like [that] you have to go to the court of Donald Trump to get [exemptions]... that's not good capitalism," Siegel said. "That's not good free markets as far as I'm concerned."

The issue isn't necessarily tariffs themselves. Siegel actually supports consumption taxes like a Value Added Tax to replace income taxes. But Trump's tariffs? He views them as a "discriminatory" and "very imperfect" version of that concept. When businesses have to petition the White House for relief, you're creating centralized favoritism instead of letting markets function openly. That's the opposite of free-market capitalism.

Siegel was direct about the bottom line: the tariffs are "net a negative" for both the U.S. economy and stock markets when viewed in isolation.

Why Siegel Stays Bullish Anyway

Here's where it gets interesting. Despite his harsh words about trade policy, Siegel remains optimistic about the broader financial picture. Why? Because he believes other elements of the Trump administration's economic agenda are more than compensating for the tariff drag.

Siegel pointed specifically to deregulation, the extension of tax cuts including immediate expensing of capital expenditures, and moving away from what he called the "crazy antitrust" policies of the Joe Biden administration.

"The deregulation... the less fervent anti-merger movement... that offsets, more than offsets, the negative of the tariffs," Siegel explained.

It's a balancing act. The tariff system creates inefficiencies and market distortions, but the regulatory relief and tax policies are apparently strong enough tailwinds to overcome those headwinds.

Tariffs As Leverage, Not Permanence

Siegel also offered some reassurance about his initial concerns. He'd worried about a spiraling trade war, but that fear has subsided somewhat. The administration's willingness to negotiate lower rates with foreign trade representatives suggests the tariffs function more as negotiating leverage than permanent trade barriers.

Still, the core problem remains: when economic viability depends on securing specific exemptions from the President, that's a structural flaw in how capitalism should operate.

Markets seemed unconcerned on Wednesday, with futures for the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, and Dow Jones indices trading higher following a positive Tuesday session.

The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) and Invesco QQQ Trust ETF (QQQ), which track the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 respectively, both closed higher on Tuesday. The SPY climbed 0.94% to $675.02, while the QQQ advanced 0.62% to $608.89, according to market data.

Back to News

Wharton's Jeremy Siegel Says Trump Tariff Exemptions Create 'Court of Donald Trump' Instead of Free Markets

MarketDash Editorial Team
12 days ago
Finance professor Jeremy Siegel criticizes Trump's tariff exemption process as fundamentally anti-capitalist, though he believes deregulation and tax policies are offsetting the damage to markets.

When you're known as the "Wizard of Wharton," people tend to listen when you critique economic policy. And Jeremy Siegel, the renowned finance professor, isn't holding back on President Donald Trump's approach to trade.

The Problem With Presidential Exemptions

In a recent appearance on the Icons and Ideas podcast with Peter Mallouk, Siegel took aim at what he sees as a fundamental flaw in the current tariff structure: the exemption process itself.

"I don't particularly like [that] you have to go to the court of Donald Trump to get [exemptions]... that's not good capitalism," Siegel said. "That's not good free markets as far as I'm concerned."

The issue isn't necessarily tariffs themselves. Siegel actually supports consumption taxes like a Value Added Tax to replace income taxes. But Trump's tariffs? He views them as a "discriminatory" and "very imperfect" version of that concept. When businesses have to petition the White House for relief, you're creating centralized favoritism instead of letting markets function openly. That's the opposite of free-market capitalism.

Siegel was direct about the bottom line: the tariffs are "net a negative" for both the U.S. economy and stock markets when viewed in isolation.

Why Siegel Stays Bullish Anyway

Here's where it gets interesting. Despite his harsh words about trade policy, Siegel remains optimistic about the broader financial picture. Why? Because he believes other elements of the Trump administration's economic agenda are more than compensating for the tariff drag.

Siegel pointed specifically to deregulation, the extension of tax cuts including immediate expensing of capital expenditures, and moving away from what he called the "crazy antitrust" policies of the Joe Biden administration.

"The deregulation... the less fervent anti-merger movement... that offsets, more than offsets, the negative of the tariffs," Siegel explained.

It's a balancing act. The tariff system creates inefficiencies and market distortions, but the regulatory relief and tax policies are apparently strong enough tailwinds to overcome those headwinds.

Tariffs As Leverage, Not Permanence

Siegel also offered some reassurance about his initial concerns. He'd worried about a spiraling trade war, but that fear has subsided somewhat. The administration's willingness to negotiate lower rates with foreign trade representatives suggests the tariffs function more as negotiating leverage than permanent trade barriers.

Still, the core problem remains: when economic viability depends on securing specific exemptions from the President, that's a structural flaw in how capitalism should operate.

Markets seemed unconcerned on Wednesday, with futures for the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, and Dow Jones indices trading higher following a positive Tuesday session.

The SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) and Invesco QQQ Trust ETF (QQQ), which track the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 respectively, both closed higher on Tuesday. The SPY climbed 0.94% to $675.02, while the QQQ advanced 0.62% to $608.89, according to market data.