Marketdash
Back to News

TSMC Learned to Dance With 400 Partners While Intel Danced Alone: How Jensen Huang's Metaphor Explains a $1 Trillion Gap

MarketDash Editorial Team
11 days ago
Morris Chang once recalled Jensen Huang's famous analogy about why TSMC succeeded where Intel stumbled. The metaphor was about dancing—and it explains how TSMC now commands 60% of the global chip foundry market with a $1.16 trillion valuation while Intel struggles at $175 billion.

Sometimes a metaphor tells you everything you need to know. Back in 2023, Morris Chang—the legendary founder of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM)—stood at a semiconductor forum and recalled something Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang once said that perfectly captured why Intel Corp. (INTC) faces such an uphill battle in the chip foundry business.

Huang's line? TSMC had learned to "dance with 400 partners," while Intel "has always danced alone."

It's a vivid way to describe what turns out to be about a trillion-dollar difference in market value. Let's break down how we got here.

The Philosophy Behind the Dance

Chang brought up Huang's analogy at a CommonWealth magazine forum to explain the competitive gap that has opened up between the two semiconductor giants. The metaphor wasn't just clever—it was accurate. TSMC built its entire business model around being the partner that everyone could work with, manufacturing chips for a vast ecosystem of customers and collaborators without competing against them. Intel, meanwhile, kept its manufacturing mostly in-house, designing and producing its own chips in a vertically integrated model.

One approach fostered collaboration and openness. The other prioritized control and independence. Guess which one won?

The Investment Pitch That Intel Passed On

Here's where the story gets really interesting. In a 2014 Stanford lecture, Chang revealed that Intel actually had a chance to get in on the ground floor of what would become the world's dominant chip foundry. In the late 1980s, Chang was trying to secure funding for TSMC after the Taiwanese government agreed to cover half the initial investment. He needed private investors for the other half.

So he went knocking on doors—Intel, Toshiba, Hitachi, and Sony all heard his pitch. Intel's then-executive Craig Barrett even met with Chang twice. But ultimately, Intel said no. So did most of the others.

Only Philips showed real interest, eventually contributing 28% of the funding. The Taiwanese government put in 48%, local investors covered the rest, and TSMC launched in 1987. That decision by Intel—to pass on co-investing in what would become a $1.16 trillion company—looks more expensive every year.

A Trillion-Dollar Gap Opens Up

Fast forward to today, and the contrast couldn't be starker. As of November 2025, TSMC sits at a market valuation of about $1.16 trillion, making it one of the world's top 10 most valuable companies. Intel, meanwhile, has a market cap of roughly $175.39 billion, ranking 96th globally.

TSMC debuted on U.S. markets as an ADR in 1997 and now commands more than 60% of the global chip foundry sector. The company manufactures chips for major clients including Apple Inc. (AAPL), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), and Nvidia. Its cutting-edge process technologies and the rise of the fabless semiconductor model—where companies design chips but outsource manufacturing—have transformed the industry in TSMC's favor.

Stock Performance Tells the Story

The numbers paint a brutal picture. Over the past five years, Intel's shares have dropped more than 22%, while TSMC's stock has surged nearly 194%. That's not just a divergence—it's a chasm.

Intel posted third-quarter revenue of $13.65 billion last month, beating analysts' expectations of $13.14 billion. Sounds good, right? But its Intel Foundry unit generated $4.2 billion, which was actually down 2% from the prior year. The company is trying to pivot toward becoming a foundry that manufactures chips for others, but it's playing catch-up in a race where TSMC has a multi-decade head start.

The Dance Continues

TSMC's collaborative approach—that willingness to dance with 400 partners—created a network effect that's now almost impossible to replicate. Every major fabless chip designer relies on TSMC's advanced manufacturing capabilities, and that relationship reinforces itself. The more clients TSMC serves, the more it can invest in next-generation technology, which attracts even more clients.

Intel's go-it-alone strategy made sense in an earlier era when vertical integration was king. But the industry shifted, and TSMC was positioned perfectly for the new paradigm. Chang's vision of a pure-play foundry that didn't compete with its customers turned out to be exactly what the semiconductor world needed.

Huang's dancing metaphor captured something essential about why one company thrived while the other struggled. In the chip business, it turns out that knowing how to partner might be just as important as knowing how to manufacture. And right now, TSMC is leading that dance by a very wide margin.

Back to News

TSMC Learned to Dance With 400 Partners While Intel Danced Alone: How Jensen Huang's Metaphor Explains a $1 Trillion Gap

MarketDash Editorial Team
11 days ago
Morris Chang once recalled Jensen Huang's famous analogy about why TSMC succeeded where Intel stumbled. The metaphor was about dancing—and it explains how TSMC now commands 60% of the global chip foundry market with a $1.16 trillion valuation while Intel struggles at $175 billion.

Sometimes a metaphor tells you everything you need to know. Back in 2023, Morris Chang—the legendary founder of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM)—stood at a semiconductor forum and recalled something Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) CEO Jensen Huang once said that perfectly captured why Intel Corp. (INTC) faces such an uphill battle in the chip foundry business.

Huang's line? TSMC had learned to "dance with 400 partners," while Intel "has always danced alone."

It's a vivid way to describe what turns out to be about a trillion-dollar difference in market value. Let's break down how we got here.

The Philosophy Behind the Dance

Chang brought up Huang's analogy at a CommonWealth magazine forum to explain the competitive gap that has opened up between the two semiconductor giants. The metaphor wasn't just clever—it was accurate. TSMC built its entire business model around being the partner that everyone could work with, manufacturing chips for a vast ecosystem of customers and collaborators without competing against them. Intel, meanwhile, kept its manufacturing mostly in-house, designing and producing its own chips in a vertically integrated model.

One approach fostered collaboration and openness. The other prioritized control and independence. Guess which one won?

The Investment Pitch That Intel Passed On

Here's where the story gets really interesting. In a 2014 Stanford lecture, Chang revealed that Intel actually had a chance to get in on the ground floor of what would become the world's dominant chip foundry. In the late 1980s, Chang was trying to secure funding for TSMC after the Taiwanese government agreed to cover half the initial investment. He needed private investors for the other half.

So he went knocking on doors—Intel, Toshiba, Hitachi, and Sony all heard his pitch. Intel's then-executive Craig Barrett even met with Chang twice. But ultimately, Intel said no. So did most of the others.

Only Philips showed real interest, eventually contributing 28% of the funding. The Taiwanese government put in 48%, local investors covered the rest, and TSMC launched in 1987. That decision by Intel—to pass on co-investing in what would become a $1.16 trillion company—looks more expensive every year.

A Trillion-Dollar Gap Opens Up

Fast forward to today, and the contrast couldn't be starker. As of November 2025, TSMC sits at a market valuation of about $1.16 trillion, making it one of the world's top 10 most valuable companies. Intel, meanwhile, has a market cap of roughly $175.39 billion, ranking 96th globally.

TSMC debuted on U.S. markets as an ADR in 1997 and now commands more than 60% of the global chip foundry sector. The company manufactures chips for major clients including Apple Inc. (AAPL), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), and Nvidia. Its cutting-edge process technologies and the rise of the fabless semiconductor model—where companies design chips but outsource manufacturing—have transformed the industry in TSMC's favor.

Stock Performance Tells the Story

The numbers paint a brutal picture. Over the past five years, Intel's shares have dropped more than 22%, while TSMC's stock has surged nearly 194%. That's not just a divergence—it's a chasm.

Intel posted third-quarter revenue of $13.65 billion last month, beating analysts' expectations of $13.14 billion. Sounds good, right? But its Intel Foundry unit generated $4.2 billion, which was actually down 2% from the prior year. The company is trying to pivot toward becoming a foundry that manufactures chips for others, but it's playing catch-up in a race where TSMC has a multi-decade head start.

The Dance Continues

TSMC's collaborative approach—that willingness to dance with 400 partners—created a network effect that's now almost impossible to replicate. Every major fabless chip designer relies on TSMC's advanced manufacturing capabilities, and that relationship reinforces itself. The more clients TSMC serves, the more it can invest in next-generation technology, which attracts even more clients.

Intel's go-it-alone strategy made sense in an earlier era when vertical integration was king. But the industry shifted, and TSMC was positioned perfectly for the new paradigm. Chang's vision of a pure-play foundry that didn't compete with its customers turned out to be exactly what the semiconductor world needed.

Huang's dancing metaphor captured something essential about why one company thrived while the other struggled. In the chip business, it turns out that knowing how to partner might be just as important as knowing how to manufacture. And right now, TSMC is leading that dance by a very wide margin.

    TSMC Learned to Dance With 400 Partners While Intel Danced Alone: How Jensen Huang's Metaphor Explains a $1 Trillion Gap - MarketDash News