Domestic Radicalization Behind National Guard Shooting, DHS Secretary Says

MarketDash Editorial Team
7 days ago
The suspect in last week's fatal shooting near the White House was radicalized in the United States, according to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, raising fresh questions about vetting processes for Afghan nationals who worked alongside U.S. forces.

The suspect who killed a National Guard member near the White House last week was radicalized right here in America, according to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. That detail matters because it shifts the conversation from "who we let in" to "what happens after they arrive."

Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29-year-old Afghan national, was arrested shortly after the shooting. Here's the complicated part: before coming to the U.S. in 2021, Lakanwal actually worked with American forces and the CIA in Afghanistan. He wasn't some random person slipping through cracks—he was someone we deliberately brought over.

The attack killed U.S. Army Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, 20, and left U.S. Air Force Staff Sergeant Andrew Wolfe, 24, in critical condition. Prosecutors are pursuing first-degree murder charges and planning to seek the death penalty, according to Bloomberg.

President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance have been hammering the Biden administration over the decision to admit Lakanwal in the first place. They're pushing for a complete halt to Afghan immigration reviews and want existing Afghan residents reassessed.

Federal investigators are still digging into what exactly happened. They've conducted searches in Washington state, where Lakanwal lived with his family, and in California. While authorities are treating this as a terrorism case, they haven't publicly revealed a specific motive.

The whole situation creates an uncomfortable policy puzzle. Someone who worked alongside U.S. personnel overseas, presumably vetted at some level, still ended up carrying out a deadly attack on American soil. That's fueling broader questions about how we screen immigrants from conflict zones and whether current processes can actually identify radicalization risks. The political fallout is already shaping immigration policy discussions in Washington.

Domestic Radicalization Behind National Guard Shooting, DHS Secretary Says

MarketDash Editorial Team
7 days ago
The suspect in last week's fatal shooting near the White House was radicalized in the United States, according to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, raising fresh questions about vetting processes for Afghan nationals who worked alongside U.S. forces.

The suspect who killed a National Guard member near the White House last week was radicalized right here in America, according to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem. That detail matters because it shifts the conversation from "who we let in" to "what happens after they arrive."

Rahmanullah Lakanwal, a 29-year-old Afghan national, was arrested shortly after the shooting. Here's the complicated part: before coming to the U.S. in 2021, Lakanwal actually worked with American forces and the CIA in Afghanistan. He wasn't some random person slipping through cracks—he was someone we deliberately brought over.

The attack killed U.S. Army Specialist Sarah Beckstrom, 20, and left U.S. Air Force Staff Sergeant Andrew Wolfe, 24, in critical condition. Prosecutors are pursuing first-degree murder charges and planning to seek the death penalty, according to Bloomberg.

President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance have been hammering the Biden administration over the decision to admit Lakanwal in the first place. They're pushing for a complete halt to Afghan immigration reviews and want existing Afghan residents reassessed.

Federal investigators are still digging into what exactly happened. They've conducted searches in Washington state, where Lakanwal lived with his family, and in California. While authorities are treating this as a terrorism case, they haven't publicly revealed a specific motive.

The whole situation creates an uncomfortable policy puzzle. Someone who worked alongside U.S. personnel overseas, presumably vetted at some level, still ended up carrying out a deadly attack on American soil. That's fueling broader questions about how we screen immigrants from conflict zones and whether current processes can actually identify radicalization risks. The political fallout is already shaping immigration policy discussions in Washington.