Marketdash
Back to News

Ramsey Show Hosts Tell 65-Year-Old Retiree to Start Social Security Now — Here's Why Some Advisors Disagree

MarketDash Editorial Team
10 hours ago
Lloyd, 65, called into The Ramsey Show wondering if he should claim Social Security to stop draining his $220K retirement account. Rachel Cruze said absolutely, but experts like Suze Orman take a different view on when to claim benefits.

Lloyd had done a lot of things right. At 65, he owned his home free and clear, had $220,000 sitting in his 401(k), and was officially retired. But watching his savings get nibbled away by everyday expenses made him wonder if there was a better approach.

So he called into The Ramsey Show with a straightforward question: should he flip the switch on Social Security now and give his nest egg some breathing room?

"I'm 65 years old, be 66 in four months. I'm retired and right now I'm living off of my 401(k), and I wonder would I be better off to go ahead and start drawing Social Security and let the 401(k) gain value," Lloyd explained to hosts Rachel Cruze and Jade Warshaw.

His monthly Social Security benefit would land around $2,000. His basic living expenses? Somewhere between $1,600 and $1,700 a month.

The Hosts Didn't Hesitate

Cruze's response was immediate and emphatic. "I would go ahead and pull it," she said, referring to Social Security. "I would rather be using that money than absolutely pulling from my 401(k)."

Warshaw agreed, and the reasoning became even clearer when they learned Lloyd wasn't just skimming investment gains—he was eating into the principal itself. "If you're using the principal, then definitely what Rachel said," Warshaw added.

That distinction matters more than you might think. Living off market returns is sustainable. Spending down the core of your retirement account is a countdown clock.

"You've gotten to a point of what most people dream of, of having, you know, $220,000 in your 401(k), and you're retired and doing it," Cruze told him.

Lloyd's financial situation wasn't flawless, but it was pretty solid. He had maybe $3,000 in credit card debt and no mortgage hanging over his head. That positioned him to use Social Security the way many retirees hope to: as a steady income source that preserves their savings, not a desperate last resort.

The Ramsey Philosophy on Social Security

Rachel Cruze's advice echoes the philosophy her father, Dave Ramsey, has preached for years. He's not exactly a fan of relying on government benefits, but if you're going to claim early—say, at 62—his position is unambiguous: invest every single dollar.

In the Ramsey universe, waiting until 70 to maximize your monthly check doesn't make sense if you have the discipline to invest those early payments and let them compound. The alternative is watching your personal savings evaporate while you wait for a bigger government check down the road.

This approach stands in stark contrast to the conventional wisdom about delaying benefits. Claiming at 62 permanently reduces your monthly payment compared to waiting until full retirement age or even 70. But Ramsey's calculation is that for retirees with savings and investing discipline, those monthly checks turned into invested capital could generate more wealth than waiting for larger guaranteed payments.

Not Everyone Buys This Strategy

Financial expert Suze Orman has staked out different territory entirely. She's argued that waiting for delayed retirement credits—particularly until age 70—can produce significantly larger guaranteed monthly income for life. For someone who expects to live into their 80s or 90s, that reliable stream of inflation-adjusted income without market risk can be invaluable.

The debate essentially boils down to this: do you trust your ability to invest and grow that money better than the government's guaranteed return through delayed claiming? Or do you value the certainty of a bigger check regardless of market conditions?

What About Retirees Who Want Options Beyond This Binary Choice?

Not everyone wants to wait until 70, and not everyone wants to burn through their retirement accounts either. So what else can retirees do to bridge the gap?

Here are some practical strategies that don't require sophisticated financial engineering:

  • Start investing in smaller increments. Platforms like Arrived allow people to invest in real estate with as little as $100, creating potential passive rental income without the headaches of being a landlord.
  • Monetize extra space in your home. That spare bedroom, garage apartment, or even a large driveway can generate monthly income with relatively little effort.
  • Convert hobbies into income streams. Woodworking, baking, crafts, pet sitting—activities you might already enjoy doing can add a few hundred dollars monthly without feeling like a grind.
  • Pick up flexible local work. Seasonal positions, tutoring, customer service roles, or delivery gigs can supplement income without requiring full-time commitment.

The Bottom Line for Lloyd

For Lloyd specifically, Cruze's message was reassuring: he'd earned this. "Enjoy that," she told him. "You worked hard for it."

With a paid-off house, minimal debt, and a decent financial cushion, turning on Social Security gave Lloyd exactly what he needed—a way to preserve his 401(k) while securing guaranteed monthly income. Whether someone follows the early-claim-and-invest approach or waits to maximize delayed retirement credits, the critical factor is understanding the trade-offs clearly and choosing the strategy that matches their specific financial situation and longevity expectations.

There's no universally correct answer here. But there are definitely wrong ones—like draining your principal when you have other options available.

Back to News

Ramsey Show Hosts Tell 65-Year-Old Retiree to Start Social Security Now — Here's Why Some Advisors Disagree

MarketDash Editorial Team
10 hours ago
Lloyd, 65, called into The Ramsey Show wondering if he should claim Social Security to stop draining his $220K retirement account. Rachel Cruze said absolutely, but experts like Suze Orman take a different view on when to claim benefits.

Lloyd had done a lot of things right. At 65, he owned his home free and clear, had $220,000 sitting in his 401(k), and was officially retired. But watching his savings get nibbled away by everyday expenses made him wonder if there was a better approach.

So he called into The Ramsey Show with a straightforward question: should he flip the switch on Social Security now and give his nest egg some breathing room?

"I'm 65 years old, be 66 in four months. I'm retired and right now I'm living off of my 401(k), and I wonder would I be better off to go ahead and start drawing Social Security and let the 401(k) gain value," Lloyd explained to hosts Rachel Cruze and Jade Warshaw.

His monthly Social Security benefit would land around $2,000. His basic living expenses? Somewhere between $1,600 and $1,700 a month.

The Hosts Didn't Hesitate

Cruze's response was immediate and emphatic. "I would go ahead and pull it," she said, referring to Social Security. "I would rather be using that money than absolutely pulling from my 401(k)."

Warshaw agreed, and the reasoning became even clearer when they learned Lloyd wasn't just skimming investment gains—he was eating into the principal itself. "If you're using the principal, then definitely what Rachel said," Warshaw added.

That distinction matters more than you might think. Living off market returns is sustainable. Spending down the core of your retirement account is a countdown clock.

"You've gotten to a point of what most people dream of, of having, you know, $220,000 in your 401(k), and you're retired and doing it," Cruze told him.

Lloyd's financial situation wasn't flawless, but it was pretty solid. He had maybe $3,000 in credit card debt and no mortgage hanging over his head. That positioned him to use Social Security the way many retirees hope to: as a steady income source that preserves their savings, not a desperate last resort.

The Ramsey Philosophy on Social Security

Rachel Cruze's advice echoes the philosophy her father, Dave Ramsey, has preached for years. He's not exactly a fan of relying on government benefits, but if you're going to claim early—say, at 62—his position is unambiguous: invest every single dollar.

In the Ramsey universe, waiting until 70 to maximize your monthly check doesn't make sense if you have the discipline to invest those early payments and let them compound. The alternative is watching your personal savings evaporate while you wait for a bigger government check down the road.

This approach stands in stark contrast to the conventional wisdom about delaying benefits. Claiming at 62 permanently reduces your monthly payment compared to waiting until full retirement age or even 70. But Ramsey's calculation is that for retirees with savings and investing discipline, those monthly checks turned into invested capital could generate more wealth than waiting for larger guaranteed payments.

Not Everyone Buys This Strategy

Financial expert Suze Orman has staked out different territory entirely. She's argued that waiting for delayed retirement credits—particularly until age 70—can produce significantly larger guaranteed monthly income for life. For someone who expects to live into their 80s or 90s, that reliable stream of inflation-adjusted income without market risk can be invaluable.

The debate essentially boils down to this: do you trust your ability to invest and grow that money better than the government's guaranteed return through delayed claiming? Or do you value the certainty of a bigger check regardless of market conditions?

What About Retirees Who Want Options Beyond This Binary Choice?

Not everyone wants to wait until 70, and not everyone wants to burn through their retirement accounts either. So what else can retirees do to bridge the gap?

Here are some practical strategies that don't require sophisticated financial engineering:

  • Start investing in smaller increments. Platforms like Arrived allow people to invest in real estate with as little as $100, creating potential passive rental income without the headaches of being a landlord.
  • Monetize extra space in your home. That spare bedroom, garage apartment, or even a large driveway can generate monthly income with relatively little effort.
  • Convert hobbies into income streams. Woodworking, baking, crafts, pet sitting—activities you might already enjoy doing can add a few hundred dollars monthly without feeling like a grind.
  • Pick up flexible local work. Seasonal positions, tutoring, customer service roles, or delivery gigs can supplement income without requiring full-time commitment.

The Bottom Line for Lloyd

For Lloyd specifically, Cruze's message was reassuring: he'd earned this. "Enjoy that," she told him. "You worked hard for it."

With a paid-off house, minimal debt, and a decent financial cushion, turning on Social Security gave Lloyd exactly what he needed—a way to preserve his 401(k) while securing guaranteed monthly income. Whether someone follows the early-claim-and-invest approach or waits to maximize delayed retirement credits, the critical factor is understanding the trade-offs clearly and choosing the strategy that matches their specific financial situation and longevity expectations.

There's no universally correct answer here. But there are definitely wrong ones—like draining your principal when you have other options available.