Marketdash
Back to News

Ben & Jerry's Board Shakeup Deepens Power Struggle As Magnum Stumbles Out Of The Gate

MarketDash Editorial Team
8 hours ago
Ben & Jerry's is removing three independent board members under new governance rules from parent company Magnum, escalating a long-running dispute over the ice cream brand's social mission. Meanwhile, Magnum's IPO debut has disappointed investors hoping for near-term dividends.

The ice cream wars just got messier. Magnum Ice Cream Company (MICC), the newly spun-off entity housing Ben & Jerry's and other frozen treats like Cornetto, is cleaning house at its most outspoken subsidiary. Three members of Ben & Jerry's independent board are getting shown the door, courtesy of new governance rules that look a lot like a corporate crackdown.

The headline change is a nine-year term limit for board members. That's not unusual in corporate America, but the timing here matters. The policy means board chair Anuradha Mittal, along with longtime directors Daryn Dodson and Jennifer Henderson, won't be eligible for re-election in 2026. Mittal told Reuters earlier this month she had zero intention of resigning despite mounting pressure, so this feels less like standard governance housekeeping and more like a workaround.

Magnum is also rolling out other changes, including mandatory compliance with its "code of business integrity," following last week's separation from Unilever (UL). The whole package suggests a parent company tightening the leash on a brand that's been notoriously difficult to control.

A Mission Under Siege

The backstory here goes back to 2000, when Unilever acquired Ben & Jerry's. To protect the brand's activist DNA, an independent board was created to safeguard its social mission. That board has become a perpetual thorn in corporate management's side, pushing positions on everything from Gaza ceasefires to Palestinian refugee support. Ben & Jerry's board has accused Unilever of actively blocking these efforts, and Magnum inherited this messy dispute when it split off.

Ben Cohen, the Vermont-based co-founder, isn't mincing words. He blasted the governance changes as "yet another step in Magnum's systematic effort to dismantle Ben & Jerry's from the inside and silence the very social mission that gives the brand its value." He called it a "blatant power grab," which probably isn't the kind of founder endorsement Magnum was hoping for as it launches into public markets.

Departures And Dysfunction

The board shakeup comes during a turbulent period for Ben & Jerry's. Co-founder Jerry Greenfield left the company in September after facing pressure from Unilever to keep quiet about his personal values. In October, Cohen said Greenfield was "devastated" by the decision to exit the company they built together.

Adding fuel to the fire, an independent audit conducted before the Magnum spinoff found problems at Ben & Jerry's social-mission foundation, including conflicts of interest. Management flagged these issues to the foundation's trustees, but the necessary changes never happened, according to Reuters.

Rocky IPO Landing

Magnum's debut as a standalone public company hasn't exactly been smooth. The big disappointment for investors is the dividend timeline. Magnum said it won't be paying dividends until at least 2027 as it focuses on establishing its independent operations. That's a buzzkill for income-focused investors who got used to Unilever's reliable payouts.

Still, not everyone is bearish. Some analysts have slapped Buy ratings on the stock, betting that once the forced selling from the spinoff subsides, Magnum's strong cash flows and dominant market position will become more obvious. Since its debut, Magnum (MICC) stock has climbed 10.39%. On Monday, shares rose 3.78% to close at $16.47.

The question now is whether Magnum can balance corporate discipline with the quirky, activist brand identity that makes Ben & Jerry's valuable in the first place. Based on the co-founders' reactions, that's going to be a tough scoop to serve.

Back to News

Ben & Jerry's Board Shakeup Deepens Power Struggle As Magnum Stumbles Out Of The Gate

MarketDash Editorial Team
8 hours ago
Ben & Jerry's is removing three independent board members under new governance rules from parent company Magnum, escalating a long-running dispute over the ice cream brand's social mission. Meanwhile, Magnum's IPO debut has disappointed investors hoping for near-term dividends.

The ice cream wars just got messier. Magnum Ice Cream Company (MICC), the newly spun-off entity housing Ben & Jerry's and other frozen treats like Cornetto, is cleaning house at its most outspoken subsidiary. Three members of Ben & Jerry's independent board are getting shown the door, courtesy of new governance rules that look a lot like a corporate crackdown.

The headline change is a nine-year term limit for board members. That's not unusual in corporate America, but the timing here matters. The policy means board chair Anuradha Mittal, along with longtime directors Daryn Dodson and Jennifer Henderson, won't be eligible for re-election in 2026. Mittal told Reuters earlier this month she had zero intention of resigning despite mounting pressure, so this feels less like standard governance housekeeping and more like a workaround.

Magnum is also rolling out other changes, including mandatory compliance with its "code of business integrity," following last week's separation from Unilever (UL). The whole package suggests a parent company tightening the leash on a brand that's been notoriously difficult to control.

A Mission Under Siege

The backstory here goes back to 2000, when Unilever acquired Ben & Jerry's. To protect the brand's activist DNA, an independent board was created to safeguard its social mission. That board has become a perpetual thorn in corporate management's side, pushing positions on everything from Gaza ceasefires to Palestinian refugee support. Ben & Jerry's board has accused Unilever of actively blocking these efforts, and Magnum inherited this messy dispute when it split off.

Ben Cohen, the Vermont-based co-founder, isn't mincing words. He blasted the governance changes as "yet another step in Magnum's systematic effort to dismantle Ben & Jerry's from the inside and silence the very social mission that gives the brand its value." He called it a "blatant power grab," which probably isn't the kind of founder endorsement Magnum was hoping for as it launches into public markets.

Departures And Dysfunction

The board shakeup comes during a turbulent period for Ben & Jerry's. Co-founder Jerry Greenfield left the company in September after facing pressure from Unilever to keep quiet about his personal values. In October, Cohen said Greenfield was "devastated" by the decision to exit the company they built together.

Adding fuel to the fire, an independent audit conducted before the Magnum spinoff found problems at Ben & Jerry's social-mission foundation, including conflicts of interest. Management flagged these issues to the foundation's trustees, but the necessary changes never happened, according to Reuters.

Rocky IPO Landing

Magnum's debut as a standalone public company hasn't exactly been smooth. The big disappointment for investors is the dividend timeline. Magnum said it won't be paying dividends until at least 2027 as it focuses on establishing its independent operations. That's a buzzkill for income-focused investors who got used to Unilever's reliable payouts.

Still, not everyone is bearish. Some analysts have slapped Buy ratings on the stock, betting that once the forced selling from the spinoff subsides, Magnum's strong cash flows and dominant market position will become more obvious. Since its debut, Magnum (MICC) stock has climbed 10.39%. On Monday, shares rose 3.78% to close at $16.47.

The question now is whether Magnum can balance corporate discipline with the quirky, activist brand identity that makes Ben & Jerry's valuable in the first place. Based on the co-founders' reactions, that's going to be a tough scoop to serve.