Marketdash
Back to News

AI Actress Creator Says She's Not Here to Replace Real Actors — But Hollywood Isn't Buying It

MarketDash Editorial Team
8 hours ago
Particle6 CEO Eline Van Der Velden insists AI actress Tilly Norwood won't replace human performers, but Hollywood stars and SAG-AFTRA remain deeply skeptical. Van Der Velden, herself an actress, argues AI can help productions stay under budget and create a new storytelling genre, while critics see it as a threat to the human connection that makes entertainment meaningful.

When Particle6 introduced Tilly Norwood, an AI-generated actress, back in September, the response from Hollywood was swift and decidedly unfriendly. Stars spoke out, the actors' union issued pointed statements, and the whole thing became exactly the kind of AI controversy you'd expect. But CEO Eline Van Der Velden wants everyone to know this is all a big misunderstanding.

"That's not what she's here for and that's absolutely not my plan," Van Der Velden told ABC News last week, addressing concerns that Norwood represents the beginning of the end for human performers.

The problem? Nobody in Hollywood seems particularly convinced. Emily Blunt summed up the industry sentiment pretty bluntly when speaking to Variety: "I don't know how to quite answer it, other than to say how terrifying this is. Come on, agencies, don't do that. Please stop. Please stop taking away our human connection."

Norwood hasn't actually appeared in any movies or TV shows yet, but her mere existence has already become a flashpoint in the ongoing debate about AI's role in entertainment.

An Actress Creating an AI Actress

Here's where it gets interesting: Van Der Velden isn't some Silicon Valley tech bro trying to disrupt Hollywood from the outside. She's an actress herself, with credits in British and Dutch television. Her pitch is that she wants to help the creative industries integrate AI in a way that actually benefits them, rather than having tech companies dictate the terms.

"I'm part of the creative industry, so I want us to be in control of the guidelines and the ethics around this and it not to be imposed by the tech industry," Van Der Velden explained.

Her economic argument goes like this: many productions get stuck in development hell because they're missing 20% or 30% of their budget. By using AI to lower costs, those projects could actually get made, creating more work opportunities overall. "So by using AI and facilitating that budget to be lower, we're actually getting productions going and getting more people into work," she told ABC News.

SAG-AFTRA Draws a Hard Line

The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists isn't having it. AI was one of the central battlegrounds in their months-long strike that ended in late 2023, which secured protections against AI usage including compensation for actors who get digitally replicated.

The union's statement on Norwood pulled no punches: "To be clear, 'Tilly Norwood' is not an actor, it's a character generated by a computer program that was trained on the work of countless professional performers — without permission or compensation. It has no life experience to draw from, no emotion and, from what we've seen, audiences aren't interested in watching computer-generated content untethered from the human experience."

SAG-AFTRA officials have been skeptical of most AI projects in film, including Disney (DIS) licensing its characters for use in OpenAI's Sora video generator.

The 'AI Genre' Vision

Van Der Velden sees this differently. She's not trying to make AI actors indistinguishable from humans, she argues. Instead, she envisions AI creating an entirely new category of storytelling.

"It's a great poetic space where you can create anything beyond that's possible within camera," she told ABC News. "So we really want to play in that. We think there's a whole creative renaissance happening and a great new way to tell new stories."

The first test case arrives early next year. "Streets of the Past," a Dutch TV project, will use AI to show viewers what historical Dutch sites looked like years ago. It's the kind of application that might be less threatening than having AI actors star in traditional dramas or comedies.

Van Der Velden believes this represents an expansion of the entertainment industry, not a replacement. "We're going to expand as an industry, not just animation, film and TV, but also this AI genre," she said. "I think there'll be lots of different films in which hopefully Tilly can star and we can tell stories through Tilly."

Whether Hollywood buys that vision, or whether Tilly Norwood remains a cautionary tale about AI overreach, remains to be seen. For now, the battle lines are pretty clearly drawn, and Emily Blunt's plea to "please stop" probably captures where most working actors stand on the question.

Back to News

AI Actress Creator Says She's Not Here to Replace Real Actors — But Hollywood Isn't Buying It

MarketDash Editorial Team
8 hours ago
Particle6 CEO Eline Van Der Velden insists AI actress Tilly Norwood won't replace human performers, but Hollywood stars and SAG-AFTRA remain deeply skeptical. Van Der Velden, herself an actress, argues AI can help productions stay under budget and create a new storytelling genre, while critics see it as a threat to the human connection that makes entertainment meaningful.

When Particle6 introduced Tilly Norwood, an AI-generated actress, back in September, the response from Hollywood was swift and decidedly unfriendly. Stars spoke out, the actors' union issued pointed statements, and the whole thing became exactly the kind of AI controversy you'd expect. But CEO Eline Van Der Velden wants everyone to know this is all a big misunderstanding.

"That's not what she's here for and that's absolutely not my plan," Van Der Velden told ABC News last week, addressing concerns that Norwood represents the beginning of the end for human performers.

The problem? Nobody in Hollywood seems particularly convinced. Emily Blunt summed up the industry sentiment pretty bluntly when speaking to Variety: "I don't know how to quite answer it, other than to say how terrifying this is. Come on, agencies, don't do that. Please stop. Please stop taking away our human connection."

Norwood hasn't actually appeared in any movies or TV shows yet, but her mere existence has already become a flashpoint in the ongoing debate about AI's role in entertainment.

An Actress Creating an AI Actress

Here's where it gets interesting: Van Der Velden isn't some Silicon Valley tech bro trying to disrupt Hollywood from the outside. She's an actress herself, with credits in British and Dutch television. Her pitch is that she wants to help the creative industries integrate AI in a way that actually benefits them, rather than having tech companies dictate the terms.

"I'm part of the creative industry, so I want us to be in control of the guidelines and the ethics around this and it not to be imposed by the tech industry," Van Der Velden explained.

Her economic argument goes like this: many productions get stuck in development hell because they're missing 20% or 30% of their budget. By using AI to lower costs, those projects could actually get made, creating more work opportunities overall. "So by using AI and facilitating that budget to be lower, we're actually getting productions going and getting more people into work," she told ABC News.

SAG-AFTRA Draws a Hard Line

The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists isn't having it. AI was one of the central battlegrounds in their months-long strike that ended in late 2023, which secured protections against AI usage including compensation for actors who get digitally replicated.

The union's statement on Norwood pulled no punches: "To be clear, 'Tilly Norwood' is not an actor, it's a character generated by a computer program that was trained on the work of countless professional performers — without permission or compensation. It has no life experience to draw from, no emotion and, from what we've seen, audiences aren't interested in watching computer-generated content untethered from the human experience."

SAG-AFTRA officials have been skeptical of most AI projects in film, including Disney (DIS) licensing its characters for use in OpenAI's Sora video generator.

The 'AI Genre' Vision

Van Der Velden sees this differently. She's not trying to make AI actors indistinguishable from humans, she argues. Instead, she envisions AI creating an entirely new category of storytelling.

"It's a great poetic space where you can create anything beyond that's possible within camera," she told ABC News. "So we really want to play in that. We think there's a whole creative renaissance happening and a great new way to tell new stories."

The first test case arrives early next year. "Streets of the Past," a Dutch TV project, will use AI to show viewers what historical Dutch sites looked like years ago. It's the kind of application that might be less threatening than having AI actors star in traditional dramas or comedies.

Van Der Velden believes this represents an expansion of the entertainment industry, not a replacement. "We're going to expand as an industry, not just animation, film and TV, but also this AI genre," she said. "I think there'll be lots of different films in which hopefully Tilly can star and we can tell stories through Tilly."

Whether Hollywood buys that vision, or whether Tilly Norwood remains a cautionary tale about AI overreach, remains to be seen. For now, the battle lines are pretty clearly drawn, and Emily Blunt's plea to "please stop" probably captures where most working actors stand on the question.

    AI Actress Creator Says She's Not Here to Replace Real Actors — But Hollywood Isn't Buying It - MarketDash News