Marketdash

Why Bitcoin's Death Cross Might Not Be As Scary As It Sounds

MarketDash Editorial Team
5 hours ago
Bitcoin just triggered another death cross, but before you panic, history shows this supposedly ominous signal has actually appeared near market bottoms more often than the start of major crashes.

Bitcoin (BTC) just flashed a death cross, and if you're feeling nervous, you're not alone. The pattern sounds apocalyptic by design, and it's exactly the kind of technical signal that sends anxious messages flooding into analysts' inboxes.

What's Got Everyone Spooked

The death cross happens when Bitcoin's 50-day moving average drops below its 200-day moving average. It's a widely watched technical indicator, and it's shown up at a moment when Bitcoin's momentum has cooled and broader economic uncertainty remains elevated. Not exactly the backdrop that inspires confidence.

Matthew Sigel, head of digital assets research at VanEck, has been fielding exactly that kind of concern from clients lately. His response? Pull up the historical data and see what actually happened the last time this signal appeared.

The Death Cross Has a Terrible Track Record at Predicting Crashes

Sigel went back through every Bitcoin death cross since 2011, and the results are pretty surprising. Rather than being some kind of early warning system, the indicator tends to show up late to the party, after most of the damage is already done.

Here's the kicker: across all death cross events since 2011, Bitcoin's median return six months later was about 30%. The 12-month median gain? Roughly 89%. And positive outcomes occurred around 64% of the time. That's not exactly the behavior you'd expect from a signal that supposedly warns of impending doom.

Context Matters More Than The Signal Itself

The important distinction, according to Sigel, is what kind of market environment the death cross appears in. Death crosses that showed up near cycle bottoms often marked the moment when selling pressure had already peaked and prices were starting to stabilize.

Think 2011, 2015, 2020, and 2023. All of those death crosses were followed by strong recoveries. In those cases, six-month returns ranged from 75% to 173%, and 12-month gains hit as high as 812% during the COVID-19 bottom. Not bad for a supposedly bearish signal.

On the flip side, death crosses that appeared in 2014, 2018, and 2022 showed up before the selling was actually finished. Those periods still had forced liquidations and balance-sheet stress pushing prices lower, so the signal arrived too early to be useful as a buy opportunity.

The ETF Era Changes Things

The most recent historical comparison comes from 2024, which Sigel calls the "post-ETF regime." During that period, Bitcoin gained about 58% over the following six months and roughly 94% over 12 months.

That environment looked different from earlier cycles, with ETF-related demand and institutional flows playing a much larger role in how Bitcoin's price formed. It's a reminder that market structure evolves, and past patterns don't always repeat perfectly.

Current Technicals Point Toward Bottoming, Not Breaking Down

Looking at where Bitcoin stands today, the setup looks more like a bottoming phase than the beginning of a fresh collapse. Bitcoin has already absorbed significant selling pressure, and this death cross is printing after a 30%+ drawdown, not ahead of one.

Bitcoin is trading below both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, but the gap between price and those short-term averages isn't widening anymore. That's often an early sign that downside momentum is running out of steam.

If selling does resume, the next area where buyers are statistically likely to step in sits around $75,000 to $77,000, where prior demand and untested liquidity align. The technical picture would only really improve if Bitcoin breaks and holds above its descending trendline and reclaims the $92,000 to $95,000 region.

So yes, the death cross sounds scary. But if history is any guide, it might actually be telling you the worst is already over.

Why Bitcoin's Death Cross Might Not Be As Scary As It Sounds

MarketDash Editorial Team
5 hours ago
Bitcoin just triggered another death cross, but before you panic, history shows this supposedly ominous signal has actually appeared near market bottoms more often than the start of major crashes.

Bitcoin (BTC) just flashed a death cross, and if you're feeling nervous, you're not alone. The pattern sounds apocalyptic by design, and it's exactly the kind of technical signal that sends anxious messages flooding into analysts' inboxes.

What's Got Everyone Spooked

The death cross happens when Bitcoin's 50-day moving average drops below its 200-day moving average. It's a widely watched technical indicator, and it's shown up at a moment when Bitcoin's momentum has cooled and broader economic uncertainty remains elevated. Not exactly the backdrop that inspires confidence.

Matthew Sigel, head of digital assets research at VanEck, has been fielding exactly that kind of concern from clients lately. His response? Pull up the historical data and see what actually happened the last time this signal appeared.

The Death Cross Has a Terrible Track Record at Predicting Crashes

Sigel went back through every Bitcoin death cross since 2011, and the results are pretty surprising. Rather than being some kind of early warning system, the indicator tends to show up late to the party, after most of the damage is already done.

Here's the kicker: across all death cross events since 2011, Bitcoin's median return six months later was about 30%. The 12-month median gain? Roughly 89%. And positive outcomes occurred around 64% of the time. That's not exactly the behavior you'd expect from a signal that supposedly warns of impending doom.

Context Matters More Than The Signal Itself

The important distinction, according to Sigel, is what kind of market environment the death cross appears in. Death crosses that showed up near cycle bottoms often marked the moment when selling pressure had already peaked and prices were starting to stabilize.

Think 2011, 2015, 2020, and 2023. All of those death crosses were followed by strong recoveries. In those cases, six-month returns ranged from 75% to 173%, and 12-month gains hit as high as 812% during the COVID-19 bottom. Not bad for a supposedly bearish signal.

On the flip side, death crosses that appeared in 2014, 2018, and 2022 showed up before the selling was actually finished. Those periods still had forced liquidations and balance-sheet stress pushing prices lower, so the signal arrived too early to be useful as a buy opportunity.

The ETF Era Changes Things

The most recent historical comparison comes from 2024, which Sigel calls the "post-ETF regime." During that period, Bitcoin gained about 58% over the following six months and roughly 94% over 12 months.

That environment looked different from earlier cycles, with ETF-related demand and institutional flows playing a much larger role in how Bitcoin's price formed. It's a reminder that market structure evolves, and past patterns don't always repeat perfectly.

Current Technicals Point Toward Bottoming, Not Breaking Down

Looking at where Bitcoin stands today, the setup looks more like a bottoming phase than the beginning of a fresh collapse. Bitcoin has already absorbed significant selling pressure, and this death cross is printing after a 30%+ drawdown, not ahead of one.

Bitcoin is trading below both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, but the gap between price and those short-term averages isn't widening anymore. That's often an early sign that downside momentum is running out of steam.

If selling does resume, the next area where buyers are statistically likely to step in sits around $75,000 to $77,000, where prior demand and untested liquidity align. The technical picture would only really improve if Bitcoin breaks and holds above its descending trendline and reclaims the $92,000 to $95,000 region.

So yes, the death cross sounds scary. But if history is any guide, it might actually be telling you the worst is already over.