Marketdash
Back to News

The AI Honeymoon Is Over: JPMorgan Says Show Us The Money

MarketDash Editorial Team
13 hours ago
CEOs went all-in on generative AI in 2025, but the expected revenue and profit gains didn't materialize. Now investors want proof that the hype translates into actual returns, and 2026 is shaping up as the year where AI companies either deliver results or lose their premium.

Here's the thing about generative AI in 2025: everyone spent money on it, talked about it endlessly, and built it into their investor decks. What they didn't do, at least not as much as they hoped, was make money from it. JPMorgan's 2026 outlook, drawing on fresh CEO survey data, paints a picture of an industry waking up from the hype cycle and asking an uncomfortable question: where are the profits?

The Expectation Gap Is Real

PwC surveyed more than 4,700 CEOs across 109 countries, and the results tell a consistent story. Over 40% started 2025 convinced that GenAI would drive revenue growth. Nearly half expected profitability gains. By year-end, only about a third reported seeing those outcomes actually materialize. Efficiency improvements showed up more reliably, but even those fell short of what executives had penciled in.

JPMorgan isn't calling AI spending a mistake. The technology is real, and adoption happened fast. But monetization? That's been sluggish. Turning AI capabilities into actual top-line growth and margin expansion turned out to be trickier than the pitch decks suggested.

ROI Is The New Buzzword

That gap is changing how companies approach AI investments. Boards and CFOs are now pushing back, demanding clearer financial outcomes before approving new projects. The era of experimental AI budgets is giving way to ROI discipline. Growth still matters, but only if it comes with margin improvement attached.

Valuation frameworks are tightening too. Metrics like the Rule of 40, and JPMorgan's even stricter Rule of X, are back in fashion as gatekeepers rather than nice-to-haves. The market is sorting winners from storytellers.

What This Means For 2026

The takeaway for this year is simple: AI narratives won't automatically command premium valuations anymore. Investors are rotating toward companies that can demonstrate both innovation and durable earnings power. Belief alone won't cut it. The numbers need to back up the story, or the market will move on.

In other words, 2026 is the year AI companies have to prove it wasn't all just expensive theater.

Back to News

The AI Honeymoon Is Over: JPMorgan Says Show Us The Money

MarketDash Editorial Team
13 hours ago
CEOs went all-in on generative AI in 2025, but the expected revenue and profit gains didn't materialize. Now investors want proof that the hype translates into actual returns, and 2026 is shaping up as the year where AI companies either deliver results or lose their premium.

Here's the thing about generative AI in 2025: everyone spent money on it, talked about it endlessly, and built it into their investor decks. What they didn't do, at least not as much as they hoped, was make money from it. JPMorgan's 2026 outlook, drawing on fresh CEO survey data, paints a picture of an industry waking up from the hype cycle and asking an uncomfortable question: where are the profits?

The Expectation Gap Is Real

PwC surveyed more than 4,700 CEOs across 109 countries, and the results tell a consistent story. Over 40% started 2025 convinced that GenAI would drive revenue growth. Nearly half expected profitability gains. By year-end, only about a third reported seeing those outcomes actually materialize. Efficiency improvements showed up more reliably, but even those fell short of what executives had penciled in.

JPMorgan isn't calling AI spending a mistake. The technology is real, and adoption happened fast. But monetization? That's been sluggish. Turning AI capabilities into actual top-line growth and margin expansion turned out to be trickier than the pitch decks suggested.

ROI Is The New Buzzword

That gap is changing how companies approach AI investments. Boards and CFOs are now pushing back, demanding clearer financial outcomes before approving new projects. The era of experimental AI budgets is giving way to ROI discipline. Growth still matters, but only if it comes with margin improvement attached.

Valuation frameworks are tightening too. Metrics like the Rule of 40, and JPMorgan's even stricter Rule of X, are back in fashion as gatekeepers rather than nice-to-haves. The market is sorting winners from storytellers.

What This Means For 2026

The takeaway for this year is simple: AI narratives won't automatically command premium valuations anymore. Investors are rotating toward companies that can demonstrate both innovation and durable earnings power. Belief alone won't cut it. The numbers need to back up the story, or the market will move on.

In other words, 2026 is the year AI companies have to prove it wasn't all just expensive theater.