Marketdash
Back to News

Real Estate Listings Are Catfishing Buyers With Wide-Angle Lenses And Twilight Filters

MarketDash Editorial Team
4 hours ago
A frustrated home buyer calls out deceptive listing photos that make rooms look massive and windows glow like radioactive portals. The problem isn't just bad photography—it's broken trust in a sluggish housing market where homes sit for 53 days on average.

There's a special kind of exhaustion that comes from driving 40 minutes to see a house, walking through the door, and immediately realizing you've been had. The "spacious" bedroom is actually 9x9 feet. The glowing windows from the listing photos were twilight magic. And somehow, the whole place feels like it shrunk in the wash.

One fed-up buyer on the Real Estate subreddit finally said what everyone's thinking: "Agents, please stop doing this with listing photos!" Their complaint struck a nerve because it wasn't about nitpicking—it was about trust.

"I've been scrolling listings for months and I swear I can tell, purely from the photos, whether I'm about to see a normal house… or drive 40 minutes to get catfished by a 'spacious' 9x9 bedroom shot with a lens borrowed from NASA."

When Staging Becomes Deception

The problem isn't that real estate photography exists. It's that too many listings cross the line from "putting your best foot forward" to "creating an alternate reality." As the buyer put it: "When a listing is good, it feels like the seller/agent is saying: 'Here's the house. Come see if it works for you.' When it's bad, it feels like: 'Here's a magic trick. Don't look behind the curtain.'"

What actually works? Natural light that looks real, not the "twilight vampire" aesthetic where every window glows radioactive. Staging that helps communicate scale rather than just style. A floor plan that fills in what photos can't show. And a logical photo sequence that tells a coherent story instead of randomly jumping between rooms.

The Red Flags Buyers Know Too Well

Then there are the dealbreakers. If a listing has 28 photos but none of the kitchen, buyers assume it's either "mid-demolition," "a time capsule from 1972," or "technically a suggestion." The same logic applies to garages and basements. "Ugly is fine. Hidden is not."

When you see seven different angles of a single bathroom but barely any living room shots, that's a problem. "If I've seen the toilet more times than I've seen the living room, we have a problem."

And when every surface is glowing and walls look like they've been dipped in neon? That's not impressive—it's suspicious. "I'm not thinking 'wow.' I'm thinking 'this is going to feel very different in person.'"

The buyer's bottom line: "Deceptive listing photos don't 'market' the house. They just waste everyone's time." If the first words out of someone's mouth when they walk in are, "oh… it's smaller than I thought," that's not a win. That's a disappointment baked into the process before the showing even started.

The Photography Problem Goes Deeper

In the comments, other buyers and even photographers piled on. One person noted, "Close-up photos of the furniture. I'm not buying their furniture, I'm buying the house." Another shared a particularly egregious example: "There's one listing with AI-staged photos that shows rolling meadows through the windows. The actual view is a parking lot full of trucks."

A working real estate photographer chimed in with some industry reality. Many agents won't pay for floor plans or include them in listings, even when photographers offer to add them for just $20. Agents often request only 15 "best" images even when provided with dozens. "They'll regularly say no," the photographer wrote, highlighting how the problem isn't always the photographer's choice.

The core complaint is straightforward: buyers aren't asking for glamour shots. They want honesty. As the original poster put it, "Just open the curtains, let the house look like it does on a normal Tuesday."

The Market Context Makes It Worse

Here's what makes this frustration more acute: homes are taking longer to sell than they did a few years ago. According to Redfin data from November 2025, the typical U.S. listing spent about 53 days on the market, up year-over-year as inventory builds and buyer activity stays soft.

In a sluggish market where buyers can scroll through dozens of listings before making a move, there's obvious temptation for sellers and agents to use flashy photos to stand out. But as this exhausted buyer points out, tactics that mislead don't actually sell homes—they just waste time on both sides of the transaction.

Different Ways Into Real Estate

For people who want real estate exposure without the hassle of touring properties or getting burned by deceptive photos, alternatives exist. Fractional investing platforms like Arrived let everyday investors buy shares of rental homes and earn passive income from real estate equity without sorting through listings or booking showings. It's a different entry point that doesn't rely on creative camera work.

Others are exploring ways to access home equity without direct ownership. Nada's Homeshares, for example, connects investors to portions of home equity and residential portfolios, providing exposure to a slice of the nearly $35 trillion U.S. home equity market without dealing with property management or misleading listing photos.

Because for many people right now, the real value isn't in another polished photo set—it's in something that actually delivers returns without the runaround.

Back to News

Real Estate Listings Are Catfishing Buyers With Wide-Angle Lenses And Twilight Filters

MarketDash Editorial Team
4 hours ago
A frustrated home buyer calls out deceptive listing photos that make rooms look massive and windows glow like radioactive portals. The problem isn't just bad photography—it's broken trust in a sluggish housing market where homes sit for 53 days on average.

There's a special kind of exhaustion that comes from driving 40 minutes to see a house, walking through the door, and immediately realizing you've been had. The "spacious" bedroom is actually 9x9 feet. The glowing windows from the listing photos were twilight magic. And somehow, the whole place feels like it shrunk in the wash.

One fed-up buyer on the Real Estate subreddit finally said what everyone's thinking: "Agents, please stop doing this with listing photos!" Their complaint struck a nerve because it wasn't about nitpicking—it was about trust.

"I've been scrolling listings for months and I swear I can tell, purely from the photos, whether I'm about to see a normal house… or drive 40 minutes to get catfished by a 'spacious' 9x9 bedroom shot with a lens borrowed from NASA."

When Staging Becomes Deception

The problem isn't that real estate photography exists. It's that too many listings cross the line from "putting your best foot forward" to "creating an alternate reality." As the buyer put it: "When a listing is good, it feels like the seller/agent is saying: 'Here's the house. Come see if it works for you.' When it's bad, it feels like: 'Here's a magic trick. Don't look behind the curtain.'"

What actually works? Natural light that looks real, not the "twilight vampire" aesthetic where every window glows radioactive. Staging that helps communicate scale rather than just style. A floor plan that fills in what photos can't show. And a logical photo sequence that tells a coherent story instead of randomly jumping between rooms.

The Red Flags Buyers Know Too Well

Then there are the dealbreakers. If a listing has 28 photos but none of the kitchen, buyers assume it's either "mid-demolition," "a time capsule from 1972," or "technically a suggestion." The same logic applies to garages and basements. "Ugly is fine. Hidden is not."

When you see seven different angles of a single bathroom but barely any living room shots, that's a problem. "If I've seen the toilet more times than I've seen the living room, we have a problem."

And when every surface is glowing and walls look like they've been dipped in neon? That's not impressive—it's suspicious. "I'm not thinking 'wow.' I'm thinking 'this is going to feel very different in person.'"

The buyer's bottom line: "Deceptive listing photos don't 'market' the house. They just waste everyone's time." If the first words out of someone's mouth when they walk in are, "oh… it's smaller than I thought," that's not a win. That's a disappointment baked into the process before the showing even started.

The Photography Problem Goes Deeper

In the comments, other buyers and even photographers piled on. One person noted, "Close-up photos of the furniture. I'm not buying their furniture, I'm buying the house." Another shared a particularly egregious example: "There's one listing with AI-staged photos that shows rolling meadows through the windows. The actual view is a parking lot full of trucks."

A working real estate photographer chimed in with some industry reality. Many agents won't pay for floor plans or include them in listings, even when photographers offer to add them for just $20. Agents often request only 15 "best" images even when provided with dozens. "They'll regularly say no," the photographer wrote, highlighting how the problem isn't always the photographer's choice.

The core complaint is straightforward: buyers aren't asking for glamour shots. They want honesty. As the original poster put it, "Just open the curtains, let the house look like it does on a normal Tuesday."

The Market Context Makes It Worse

Here's what makes this frustration more acute: homes are taking longer to sell than they did a few years ago. According to Redfin data from November 2025, the typical U.S. listing spent about 53 days on the market, up year-over-year as inventory builds and buyer activity stays soft.

In a sluggish market where buyers can scroll through dozens of listings before making a move, there's obvious temptation for sellers and agents to use flashy photos to stand out. But as this exhausted buyer points out, tactics that mislead don't actually sell homes—they just waste time on both sides of the transaction.

Different Ways Into Real Estate

For people who want real estate exposure without the hassle of touring properties or getting burned by deceptive photos, alternatives exist. Fractional investing platforms like Arrived let everyday investors buy shares of rental homes and earn passive income from real estate equity without sorting through listings or booking showings. It's a different entry point that doesn't rely on creative camera work.

Others are exploring ways to access home equity without direct ownership. Nada's Homeshares, for example, connects investors to portions of home equity and residential portfolios, providing exposure to a slice of the nearly $35 trillion U.S. home equity market without dealing with property management or misleading listing photos.

Because for many people right now, the real value isn't in another polished photo set—it's in something that actually delivers returns without the runaround.