Marketdash
Back to Stock Market News

Critical Minerals Trade Powers the Global Economy—And That's Becoming a Problem

MarketDash Editorial Team
6 hours ago
Over 60% of critical mineral demand flows through international trade, but rising geopolitical tensions and supply chain concentration are creating serious vulnerabilities as demand surges toward 2040.

Here's an uncomfortable fact about the modern economy: more than 60% of the critical minerals we depend on come from somewhere else. A recent study highlights just how dependent we've become on international trade to keep the lights on, the batteries charged, and the data centers humming. That cross-border trade has helped scale up supply, sure. But it's also created a web of vulnerabilities—geopolitical tensions, export controls, processing chokepoints—that make mineral supply chains increasingly fragile just as demand is about to explode.

"Critical minerals underpin the technological innovations that drive economic growth, energy security, supply-chain resilience, and the competitiveness of emerging clean-energy industries," according to research from the International Energy Forum (IEF). The organization's message is clear: meeting rapidly rising demand requires a forward-looking policy framework, not just a fixation on downstream technologies.

When Trade Dependence Becomes Structural Risk

The scale of this dependence is itself the problem. When more than half of your mineral supply crosses international borders, even minor disruptions can send shockwaves through global markets. Add in the fact that mining and refining are highly concentrated geographically, and you've got supply chains that are exquisitely sensitive to policy shifts, logistical hiccups, and geopolitical flare-ups.

And demand growth is only going to turn up the pressure. The IEF projects that global demand for five key energy-transition minerals—copper, nickel, cobalt, lithium, and rare earths—will climb from 28 million tons in 2021 to nearly 41 million tons by 2040.

Copper remains the heavyweight, driven by electrification and grid expansion. Nickel and lithium are posting the fastest growth rates as electric vehicles and battery manufacturing scale up. Rare earth elements and cobalt show steadier increases but remain absolutely indispensable for motors, electronics, and advanced manufacturing.

The Concentration Problem Gets Worse

Several powerful forces are driving this trend. Electric vehicles use roughly four times as much copper as conventional cars. Meanwhile, the explosive growth of artificial intelligence, data centers, and semiconductor-heavy industries is creating fierce competition for the same minerals, tightening markets across multiple sectors simultaneously.

Geographic concentration makes everything worse. Indonesia accounts for more than half of global nickel supply. The Democratic Republic of the Congo produces around 70% of the world's cobalt. China controls more than 90% of rare earth refining capacity.

The lithium market shows a similar pattern, with Australia, Chile, and China leading production. This concentration leaves dependent nations heavily exposed to policy decisions from just a handful of jurisdictions. One export control, one supply disruption, one policy shift—and global markets feel it immediately.

Governments Are Moving Fast

It shouldn't surprise anyone that governments are responding urgently. The IEF notes that since 2020, the number of critical mineral policies worldwide has nearly doubled compared to the previous two decades. Measures range from strategic planning and domestic processing mandates to export controls and incentives for exploration, recycling, and refining. While these policies aim to strengthen security, the IEF warns that uncoordinated interventions risk increasing volatility if not paired with international cooperation.

These dynamics explain why Washington continues pushing for deals that provide direct access to minerals. In 2025, the White House has stepped up efforts to reduce reliance on foreign supply chains through expanded mining and refining.

"What we want to see is the ability for the US to not be reliant on any adversary out there or any other foreign entity, that we control our own destiny when it comes to our supply chain and our critical minerals," Jarrod Agen, executive director of the White House's National Energy Dominance Council, said, according to Reuters.

"We've set a good pace so far, but this is just the first year," he noted.

Price Watch: Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) is up 93.23% year-to-date.

Back to Stock Market News

Critical Minerals Trade Powers the Global Economy—And That's Becoming a Problem

MarketDash Editorial Team
6 hours ago
Over 60% of critical mineral demand flows through international trade, but rising geopolitical tensions and supply chain concentration are creating serious vulnerabilities as demand surges toward 2040.

Here's an uncomfortable fact about the modern economy: more than 60% of the critical minerals we depend on come from somewhere else. A recent study highlights just how dependent we've become on international trade to keep the lights on, the batteries charged, and the data centers humming. That cross-border trade has helped scale up supply, sure. But it's also created a web of vulnerabilities—geopolitical tensions, export controls, processing chokepoints—that make mineral supply chains increasingly fragile just as demand is about to explode.

"Critical minerals underpin the technological innovations that drive economic growth, energy security, supply-chain resilience, and the competitiveness of emerging clean-energy industries," according to research from the International Energy Forum (IEF). The organization's message is clear: meeting rapidly rising demand requires a forward-looking policy framework, not just a fixation on downstream technologies.

When Trade Dependence Becomes Structural Risk

The scale of this dependence is itself the problem. When more than half of your mineral supply crosses international borders, even minor disruptions can send shockwaves through global markets. Add in the fact that mining and refining are highly concentrated geographically, and you've got supply chains that are exquisitely sensitive to policy shifts, logistical hiccups, and geopolitical flare-ups.

And demand growth is only going to turn up the pressure. The IEF projects that global demand for five key energy-transition minerals—copper, nickel, cobalt, lithium, and rare earths—will climb from 28 million tons in 2021 to nearly 41 million tons by 2040.

Copper remains the heavyweight, driven by electrification and grid expansion. Nickel and lithium are posting the fastest growth rates as electric vehicles and battery manufacturing scale up. Rare earth elements and cobalt show steadier increases but remain absolutely indispensable for motors, electronics, and advanced manufacturing.

The Concentration Problem Gets Worse

Several powerful forces are driving this trend. Electric vehicles use roughly four times as much copper as conventional cars. Meanwhile, the explosive growth of artificial intelligence, data centers, and semiconductor-heavy industries is creating fierce competition for the same minerals, tightening markets across multiple sectors simultaneously.

Geographic concentration makes everything worse. Indonesia accounts for more than half of global nickel supply. The Democratic Republic of the Congo produces around 70% of the world's cobalt. China controls more than 90% of rare earth refining capacity.

The lithium market shows a similar pattern, with Australia, Chile, and China leading production. This concentration leaves dependent nations heavily exposed to policy decisions from just a handful of jurisdictions. One export control, one supply disruption, one policy shift—and global markets feel it immediately.

Governments Are Moving Fast

It shouldn't surprise anyone that governments are responding urgently. The IEF notes that since 2020, the number of critical mineral policies worldwide has nearly doubled compared to the previous two decades. Measures range from strategic planning and domestic processing mandates to export controls and incentives for exploration, recycling, and refining. While these policies aim to strengthen security, the IEF warns that uncoordinated interventions risk increasing volatility if not paired with international cooperation.

These dynamics explain why Washington continues pushing for deals that provide direct access to minerals. In 2025, the White House has stepped up efforts to reduce reliance on foreign supply chains through expanded mining and refining.

"What we want to see is the ability for the US to not be reliant on any adversary out there or any other foreign entity, that we control our own destiny when it comes to our supply chain and our critical minerals," Jarrod Agen, executive director of the White House's National Energy Dominance Council, said, according to Reuters.

"We've set a good pace so far, but this is just the first year," he noted.

Price Watch: Sprott Critical Materials ETF (SETM) is up 93.23% year-to-date.

    Critical Minerals Trade Powers the Global Economy—And That's Becoming a Problem - MarketDash News