Marketdash
Back to Stock Market News

A 1989 Family Budget Goes Viral, And The Numbers Tell An Uncomfortable Story

MarketDash Editorial Team
1 day ago
When a Reddit user shared their late father's 1989 household budget, they expected nostalgia. Instead, commenters discovered the family spent the equivalent of over $10,000 monthly in today's dollars, raising questions about what middle-class really meant then versus now.

What starts as a sweet trip down memory lane doesn't always stay that way. A Reddit user posted their late father's handwritten monthly budget from June 1989 on r/MiddleClassFinance, expecting maybe some warm feelings about simpler times. Instead, the internet did what it does best: math. And the results were uncomfortable.

When Nostalgia Meets a Calculator

The budget, neatly written on graph paper, totaled $3,870 per month. Adjust that for inflation and you're looking at roughly $10,300 in today's money. Suddenly this wasn't a quaint glimpse at modest suburban life. "That's a $10,000/month budget in today's dollars. Looks pretty close to modern living, except no wage growth," one commenter noted. Another got straight to the point: "Your dad was loaded."

The real shock came from housing costs. The family paid $1,500 monthly on their mortgage, which seemed astronomical for 1989. "My parents' mortgage on a 2,000 sq ft 4b 1.6bath 1/4 acre was $480/in 1979 through 2003," one person shared. Another couldn't get past a different line item: "paid 120 a month in 1989 for a Gardener. They were living large."

The original poster filled in some details: four-bedroom house in La Verne, California, just east of Los Angeles. Purchase price: $175,000 in 1986. Dad was a tax accountant. "And yeah, we almost never ate out, but my mom did the grocery shopping and never looked at prices," they explained.

It Wasn't Just the House

If the mortgage raised eyebrows, the food budget made jaws drop. This family spent $600 monthly on groceries. "Was he eating caviar daily?" one commenter joked. Another added context: "I spend $500/month on groceries for a family of four in a [very high cost of living] area, in today's dollars, and we eat fine!"

Then there were the other expenses: $120 for that gardener, $30 for a timeshare, $100 on gifts, $300 labeled simply "Kids Stuff." Even $20 for a Los Angeles Times subscription made the list. The verdict came swiftly from commenters: "This isn't middle class finance. This is 1% finance."

The Human Side of the Spreadsheet

Beyond the economic analysis, the post struck an emotional chord. Multiple people recognized the handwriting style and graph paper as something their own fathers had used. "Seeing that made me feel nostalgic for my dad," one person wrote.

One line item carried particular weight: $30 for "Insulin, etc." The original poster shared more: "Yeah, he was type 1 diabetic since age 8. Sadly passed away from it at 59."

What began as a simple peek into the past became something else entirely. A snapshot of a lifestyle that felt achievable for a tax accountant in 1989 now seems out of reach for many families earning what should be equivalent wages today. The thread's most pointed observation captured the mood perfectly: "Me today couldn't afford your life back then."

That's the uncomfortable truth hiding in those neat columns of numbers. It's not just that things cost more now. It's that what counted as solidly middle-class living a generation ago now requires top-tier income. The budget didn't lie, even if our memories of "simpler times" might have.

Back to Stock Market News

A 1989 Family Budget Goes Viral, And The Numbers Tell An Uncomfortable Story

MarketDash Editorial Team
1 day ago
When a Reddit user shared their late father's 1989 household budget, they expected nostalgia. Instead, commenters discovered the family spent the equivalent of over $10,000 monthly in today's dollars, raising questions about what middle-class really meant then versus now.

What starts as a sweet trip down memory lane doesn't always stay that way. A Reddit user posted their late father's handwritten monthly budget from June 1989 on r/MiddleClassFinance, expecting maybe some warm feelings about simpler times. Instead, the internet did what it does best: math. And the results were uncomfortable.

When Nostalgia Meets a Calculator

The budget, neatly written on graph paper, totaled $3,870 per month. Adjust that for inflation and you're looking at roughly $10,300 in today's money. Suddenly this wasn't a quaint glimpse at modest suburban life. "That's a $10,000/month budget in today's dollars. Looks pretty close to modern living, except no wage growth," one commenter noted. Another got straight to the point: "Your dad was loaded."

The real shock came from housing costs. The family paid $1,500 monthly on their mortgage, which seemed astronomical for 1989. "My parents' mortgage on a 2,000 sq ft 4b 1.6bath 1/4 acre was $480/in 1979 through 2003," one person shared. Another couldn't get past a different line item: "paid 120 a month in 1989 for a Gardener. They were living large."

The original poster filled in some details: four-bedroom house in La Verne, California, just east of Los Angeles. Purchase price: $175,000 in 1986. Dad was a tax accountant. "And yeah, we almost never ate out, but my mom did the grocery shopping and never looked at prices," they explained.

It Wasn't Just the House

If the mortgage raised eyebrows, the food budget made jaws drop. This family spent $600 monthly on groceries. "Was he eating caviar daily?" one commenter joked. Another added context: "I spend $500/month on groceries for a family of four in a [very high cost of living] area, in today's dollars, and we eat fine!"

Then there were the other expenses: $120 for that gardener, $30 for a timeshare, $100 on gifts, $300 labeled simply "Kids Stuff." Even $20 for a Los Angeles Times subscription made the list. The verdict came swiftly from commenters: "This isn't middle class finance. This is 1% finance."

The Human Side of the Spreadsheet

Beyond the economic analysis, the post struck an emotional chord. Multiple people recognized the handwriting style and graph paper as something their own fathers had used. "Seeing that made me feel nostalgic for my dad," one person wrote.

One line item carried particular weight: $30 for "Insulin, etc." The original poster shared more: "Yeah, he was type 1 diabetic since age 8. Sadly passed away from it at 59."

What began as a simple peek into the past became something else entirely. A snapshot of a lifestyle that felt achievable for a tax accountant in 1989 now seems out of reach for many families earning what should be equivalent wages today. The thread's most pointed observation captured the mood perfectly: "Me today couldn't afford your life back then."

That's the uncomfortable truth hiding in those neat columns of numbers. It's not just that things cost more now. It's that what counted as solidly middle-class living a generation ago now requires top-tier income. The budget didn't lie, even if our memories of "simpler times" might have.