Marketdash
Back to Stock Market News

China's 1.4 Billion Shoppers Aren't Enough: Why Hong Kong Retailers Are Giving Up

MarketDash Editorial Team
3 hours ago
Mannings becomes the second major Hong Kong beauty retailer to abandon Mainland China this year, following Sa Sa's exit. The withdrawals highlight how foreign retailers are struggling against homegrown competitors and China's shift to e-commerce, leaving only Watsons standing among the former Big Three.

Here's a math problem that doesn't add up: You have access to 1.4 billion potential customers. You've been serving them for over two decades. And yet, you're packing up and going home. Welcome to the curious case of foreign retailers fleeing China's seemingly irresistible market.

DFI Retail Group Holdings Ltd. (D01), which started life as a Hong Kong dairy farm more than a century ago, just made waves by pulling its Mannings health and beauty chain out of Mainland China entirely. The company has been busy streamlining its 10,000-store retail empire across Asia, but this particular exit caught everyone's attention because it's part of a broader pattern that's hard to ignore.

The writing was on the wall, to be fair. DFI had shuttered 92 of its Mainland Mannings locations between 2023 and 2024, leaving just 16 stores at the start of this year. Still, when the official announcement hit the Mannings China WeChat channel on December 17, it landed with some force. All remaining Mainland operations would close by mid-January, with only a lightweight cross-border business remaining to let Chinese customers order from Hong Kong stores.

The Vanishing Big Three

What makes this particularly striking is that Mannings is now the second member of Hong Kong's "big three" personal care and beauty retailers to abandon the Mainland market. Sa Sa International (0178), operator of the Sasa chain, closed its remaining 18 brick-and-mortar Mainland stores by the end of June. That leaves Watsons as the last retailer standing from the original trio, still operating physical stores across China.

The trajectory tells the story. Mannings opened its first Mainland store in Guangzhou back in October 2004, riding a wave of Hong Kong retail expansion into China. By 2011, it had grown to over 200 locations. But growth stalled after 2015, and by 2018 the parent company was already publicly reassessing the business. DFI's 2024 annual report essentially telegraphed the exit, noting that declining revenues as Chinese consumers shifted online would necessitate closing "the majority" of its offline network.

And this isn't just about Mannings. DFI's China retrenchment has been comprehensive. The company closed 186 Mainland supermarket locations between 2023 and 2024. In September 2024, it sold its stake in supermarket operator Yonghui (601933) to retailer Miniso (9896) for 4.5 billion yuan, roughly $640 million. Similar underperforming assets in Singapore and the Philippines have also gotten the axe.

When Glamour Fades

To understand what went wrong, you need to rewind to the mid-2000s. That's when Hong Kong retail brands like Mannings, Sasa, and Watsons began flooding into China in significant numbers. Their value proposition was straightforward: they stocked international products that were difficult to find elsewhere and carried the glamorous Hong Kong brand at a time when China had just joined the WTO in 2001 and was entering a period of explosive economic growth.

But retail landscapes can shift with stunning speed. Just a decade later, the rise of social media, online influencers, and e-commerce had fundamentally transformed Mainland retail. Survival suddenly required both a massive internet presence and brick-and-mortar scale to give consumers the choice and convenience they'd come to expect.

The Hong Kong brands struggled with this transition. They were deeply rooted in traditional brick-and-mortar retail operations back home and moved slowly to build the online presences that had become table stakes in China. Apps, storefronts on multiple platforms, integration with social media—these weren't just nice-to-haves anymore, they were essential infrastructure.

Competition Gets Real

Here's the other problem: Hong Kong's brand cachet has been evaporating in the eyes of Chinese consumers. The city no longer carries the aspirational sheen it once did. Meanwhile, homegrown Chinese retailers have become equally sophisticated and considerably more aggressive in their marketing approach. They use local influencers on popular platforms like Douyin and RedNote with native fluency. And the rise of cross-border e-commerce erased the advantage Hong Kong stores once enjoyed with imported goods.

When Sa Sa announced its exit more than six months before Mannings, it pointed to intense competition and "a shakedown period" in the beauty retail sector. The numbers backed up the struggle: revenue dropped 9.7% and profit plummeted 65% in 2024.

Both Mannings and Sa Sa say they're pivoting to cross-border retail focused on South China's Guangdong and Hainan provinces, using bonded warehouses and capitalizing on Hainan's free trade zone launch on December 18. Another Hong Kong player, Bonjour Holdings (0653), has been steadily closing stores since its 2018 peak and announced a new cross-border retail joint venture with medical device maker Ziyuanyuan on December 11.

The Last One Standing

Mannings' peak of 200 Mainland stores and Sa Sa's high of 77 in 2022 both pale next to AS Watson Group, the world's largest health and beauty retailer. Watsons opened its first Mainland store way back in April 1989 at Beijing's Palace Hotel. The chain, which started as a Hong Kong pharmacy in 1856 and is now owned by CK Hutchison Holdings (0001), operates 3,630 stores in Mainland China as of June 30 this year, out of 16,935 worldwide.

But even Watsons isn't immune to the headwinds. The company also reported weakness in its Mainland health and beauty segment, with revenue down 3% and same-store sales falling 1% during the first half of this year. It closed 145 Mainland stores over the past year.

CK Hutchison's China health and beauty division was the only region showing declines in its global retail business during the first half of this year. While overall revenue for the division rose 8% year-on-year to HK$98.8 billion, about $12.7 billion, the company explicitly called out "adverse" performance in China, taking hits from weak consumer spending amid the country's prolonged economic slowdown.

CK Hutchison is reportedly eyeing a $2 billion Hong Kong IPO for AS Watson in 2026, timing it with one of the city's hottest markets for new listings in years. But China weakness could complicate that story. Given the massive scale of its China network and the company's repeated commitments to its China roots, Watsons seems unlikely to pull out anytime soon. Still, it faces the same brutal pressures as its now-departed Hong Kong peers: integrating online and offline business with social media while dealing with razor-thin margins and depressed consumer sentiment.

Nobody's Winning

The broader context makes this even more sobering. Overall retail sales in China grew just 1.3% year-over-year in the first 11 months of this year, according to official data. And here's the kicker: homegrown Mainland retailers aren't doing much better than their Hong Kong counterparts. As Carrie Yu, China consumer markets industry leader at PwC, told the South China Morning Post: "It doesn't matter whether it's a local, international or Hong Kong retailer, everyone is struggling."

So yes, China has 1.4 billion consumers. But having access to a market and actually making money in it are two very different things. And right now, even the locals are having trouble figuring out the equation.

Back to Stock Market News

China's 1.4 Billion Shoppers Aren't Enough: Why Hong Kong Retailers Are Giving Up

MarketDash Editorial Team
3 hours ago
Mannings becomes the second major Hong Kong beauty retailer to abandon Mainland China this year, following Sa Sa's exit. The withdrawals highlight how foreign retailers are struggling against homegrown competitors and China's shift to e-commerce, leaving only Watsons standing among the former Big Three.

Here's a math problem that doesn't add up: You have access to 1.4 billion potential customers. You've been serving them for over two decades. And yet, you're packing up and going home. Welcome to the curious case of foreign retailers fleeing China's seemingly irresistible market.

DFI Retail Group Holdings Ltd. (D01), which started life as a Hong Kong dairy farm more than a century ago, just made waves by pulling its Mannings health and beauty chain out of Mainland China entirely. The company has been busy streamlining its 10,000-store retail empire across Asia, but this particular exit caught everyone's attention because it's part of a broader pattern that's hard to ignore.

The writing was on the wall, to be fair. DFI had shuttered 92 of its Mainland Mannings locations between 2023 and 2024, leaving just 16 stores at the start of this year. Still, when the official announcement hit the Mannings China WeChat channel on December 17, it landed with some force. All remaining Mainland operations would close by mid-January, with only a lightweight cross-border business remaining to let Chinese customers order from Hong Kong stores.

The Vanishing Big Three

What makes this particularly striking is that Mannings is now the second member of Hong Kong's "big three" personal care and beauty retailers to abandon the Mainland market. Sa Sa International (0178), operator of the Sasa chain, closed its remaining 18 brick-and-mortar Mainland stores by the end of June. That leaves Watsons as the last retailer standing from the original trio, still operating physical stores across China.

The trajectory tells the story. Mannings opened its first Mainland store in Guangzhou back in October 2004, riding a wave of Hong Kong retail expansion into China. By 2011, it had grown to over 200 locations. But growth stalled after 2015, and by 2018 the parent company was already publicly reassessing the business. DFI's 2024 annual report essentially telegraphed the exit, noting that declining revenues as Chinese consumers shifted online would necessitate closing "the majority" of its offline network.

And this isn't just about Mannings. DFI's China retrenchment has been comprehensive. The company closed 186 Mainland supermarket locations between 2023 and 2024. In September 2024, it sold its stake in supermarket operator Yonghui (601933) to retailer Miniso (9896) for 4.5 billion yuan, roughly $640 million. Similar underperforming assets in Singapore and the Philippines have also gotten the axe.

When Glamour Fades

To understand what went wrong, you need to rewind to the mid-2000s. That's when Hong Kong retail brands like Mannings, Sasa, and Watsons began flooding into China in significant numbers. Their value proposition was straightforward: they stocked international products that were difficult to find elsewhere and carried the glamorous Hong Kong brand at a time when China had just joined the WTO in 2001 and was entering a period of explosive economic growth.

But retail landscapes can shift with stunning speed. Just a decade later, the rise of social media, online influencers, and e-commerce had fundamentally transformed Mainland retail. Survival suddenly required both a massive internet presence and brick-and-mortar scale to give consumers the choice and convenience they'd come to expect.

The Hong Kong brands struggled with this transition. They were deeply rooted in traditional brick-and-mortar retail operations back home and moved slowly to build the online presences that had become table stakes in China. Apps, storefronts on multiple platforms, integration with social media—these weren't just nice-to-haves anymore, they were essential infrastructure.

Competition Gets Real

Here's the other problem: Hong Kong's brand cachet has been evaporating in the eyes of Chinese consumers. The city no longer carries the aspirational sheen it once did. Meanwhile, homegrown Chinese retailers have become equally sophisticated and considerably more aggressive in their marketing approach. They use local influencers on popular platforms like Douyin and RedNote with native fluency. And the rise of cross-border e-commerce erased the advantage Hong Kong stores once enjoyed with imported goods.

When Sa Sa announced its exit more than six months before Mannings, it pointed to intense competition and "a shakedown period" in the beauty retail sector. The numbers backed up the struggle: revenue dropped 9.7% and profit plummeted 65% in 2024.

Both Mannings and Sa Sa say they're pivoting to cross-border retail focused on South China's Guangdong and Hainan provinces, using bonded warehouses and capitalizing on Hainan's free trade zone launch on December 18. Another Hong Kong player, Bonjour Holdings (0653), has been steadily closing stores since its 2018 peak and announced a new cross-border retail joint venture with medical device maker Ziyuanyuan on December 11.

The Last One Standing

Mannings' peak of 200 Mainland stores and Sa Sa's high of 77 in 2022 both pale next to AS Watson Group, the world's largest health and beauty retailer. Watsons opened its first Mainland store way back in April 1989 at Beijing's Palace Hotel. The chain, which started as a Hong Kong pharmacy in 1856 and is now owned by CK Hutchison Holdings (0001), operates 3,630 stores in Mainland China as of June 30 this year, out of 16,935 worldwide.

But even Watsons isn't immune to the headwinds. The company also reported weakness in its Mainland health and beauty segment, with revenue down 3% and same-store sales falling 1% during the first half of this year. It closed 145 Mainland stores over the past year.

CK Hutchison's China health and beauty division was the only region showing declines in its global retail business during the first half of this year. While overall revenue for the division rose 8% year-on-year to HK$98.8 billion, about $12.7 billion, the company explicitly called out "adverse" performance in China, taking hits from weak consumer spending amid the country's prolonged economic slowdown.

CK Hutchison is reportedly eyeing a $2 billion Hong Kong IPO for AS Watson in 2026, timing it with one of the city's hottest markets for new listings in years. But China weakness could complicate that story. Given the massive scale of its China network and the company's repeated commitments to its China roots, Watsons seems unlikely to pull out anytime soon. Still, it faces the same brutal pressures as its now-departed Hong Kong peers: integrating online and offline business with social media while dealing with razor-thin margins and depressed consumer sentiment.

Nobody's Winning

The broader context makes this even more sobering. Overall retail sales in China grew just 1.3% year-over-year in the first 11 months of this year, according to official data. And here's the kicker: homegrown Mainland retailers aren't doing much better than their Hong Kong counterparts. As Carrie Yu, China consumer markets industry leader at PwC, told the South China Morning Post: "It doesn't matter whether it's a local, international or Hong Kong retailer, everyone is struggling."

So yes, China has 1.4 billion consumers. But having access to a market and actually making money in it are two very different things. And right now, even the locals are having trouble figuring out the equation.

    China's 1.4 Billion Shoppers Aren't Enough: Why Hong Kong Retailers Are Giving Up - MarketDash News