Nickel is having a moment. Not a great moment, mind you, but after two brutal years of price destruction and producer shutdowns, a 5.5% monthly rally feels almost optimistic. The metal that everyone forgot is suddenly looking interesting again, closing 2025 on a positive note after bottoming out at $14,600 per ton last month.
The big question is whether this bounce represents an actual turnaround or just temporary noise in a fundamentally broken market. Because make no mistake, nickel has been absolutely hated by investors. Prices collapsed, major Western producers shuttered operations, and the headlines screamed oversupply and battery substitution at every turn.
Which is exactly why some contrarian investors are starting to pay attention. When everyone hates something this much, sometimes that's the signal. But this isn't a simple contrarian play. There are serious structural risks here that can't be ignored.
What Went Wrong
The crash wasn't a mystery. It was the predictable result of two narratives colliding with reality. First, stainless steel demand growth was supposed to provide a steady baseline. Second, the electric vehicle revolution was going to create insatiable demand for nickel-rich batteries. Capital flooded into new projects, especially in Indonesia, and output exploded from 800,000 metric tons in 2019 to 2.2 million in 2024.
That's the definition of oversupply. The International Nickel Study Group estimated a 179,000 ton surplus in 2024, rising to 198,000 tons in 2025. LME warehouse inventories swelled above 254,000 tons. Too much supply, not enough demand.
Then both demand pillars started to wobble. China's troubled property sector dampened steel demand. Meanwhile, the EV thesis began to fracture in uncomfortable ways.
Nickel-rich battery chemistries like NMC and NCA kept growing, but much more slowly than expected. Cheaper, nickel-free LFP batteries started grabbing market share. By late 2024, LFP demand was climbing 7% year-over-year, compared to just 1% for nickel-bearing batteries. Policy shocks didn't help either. The repeal of the $7,500 US EV tax credit and the first EV sales decline since 2019 hammered sentiment further.
The Indonesia Problem
Indonesia is now the 800-pound gorilla in the nickel market, accounting for over half of global production in 2025. That concentration creates serious systemic risk.
Indonesian low-grade laterite nickel operations are among the most carbon-intensive in the world, heavily reliant on coal power. Research from CRI shows these mining operations have driven deforestation, water pollution, and increased social conflict. And here's the kicker: Indonesia isn't an energy superpower. It's an energy importer. The entire industry depends on secure, affordable fossil fuel imports and continued tolerance for high emissions.
Any disruption to energy supply, tightening of environmental regulations, or carbon border adjustments from Western markets could sharply raise costs or constrain exports. That's not a small risk.
Australia has been the biggest casualty of this Indonesian oversupply wave. High-cost Australian sulfide operations simply couldn't compete with Indonesia's scale and lower operating costs. Through 2024, BHP (BHP) suspended its Nickel West division, First Quantum put Ravensthorpe into care and maintenance, and other mines like Kambalda and Savannah shut down entirely. Australia's annual production collapsed from over 150,000 tons to about 60,000.
But here's the twist: surviving low-cost producers and future "green nickel" projects in Canada and Australia could eventually command ESG premiums as industries try to de-risk from Indonesian "dirty" supply.
Why Contrarians Are Paying Attention
The contrarian case for nickel has both cyclical and structural elements. On the cyclical side, price destruction has already forced large-scale shutdowns and capital expenditure deferrals in the West. That supply is gone, at least for now.
Structurally, the demand outlook still points to mid-single-digit growth. Nickel battery demand is expected to double by 2030, despite the LFP trend. High-performance, long-range electric vehicles continue to rely on nickel-rich chemistries. According to research from Macquarie, a surplus flipping into a deficit in the late 2020s wouldn't be surprising.
That said, making a heavy bet in 2026 would likely be early. This is a patient investor's game, if it's a game at all.
The Risks Are Real
Nickel contrarianism is far from risk-free. The biggest risk is that Indonesia keeps flooding the market longer than expected, maintaining output growth to defend market share even at thin margins. When you're the low-cost producer, you can afford to wait everyone else out.
The second risk is technological. Faster-than-expected adoption of LFP or sodium-ion batteries could cap or even reduce long-term nickel demand in the battery sector. And let's not forget that the EV transition itself remains highly policy-sensitive. Government incentives can disappear as quickly as they appeared.
Still, for patient investors with strong stomachs, nickel might represent a classic deep-value contrarian commodity play. It's bruised, oversupplied, and completely out of favor. But there's a credible path to market rebalancing, and the world's dependence on one energy-hungry, politically complex supplier creates its own set of opportunities and risks.
Price Watch: Sprott Nickel Miners ETF (NIKL) is up 49.81% year-to-date.