Marketdash
Back to Stock Market News

Economist Wolfers Questions GDP Gains: Trump Policies 'Anti-Robinhood' And May Not Be Reaching Most Americans

MarketDash Editorial Team
4 hours ago
University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers is pumping the brakes on enthusiasm over the 4.3% GDP growth figure from the July-September quarter, arguing that Trump administration policies are blocking most Americans from feeling the benefits of economic expansion.

The GDP Number Looks Great, But There's a Catch

So the economy grew at 4.3% in the third quarter, which sounds fantastic on paper. But University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers wants everyone to slow their roll before breaking out the champagne. Speaking on MSNBC's "The Weekend Primetime" on Sunday, he cautioned that early GDP estimates are notoriously unreliable and "could get revised away" at any moment.

The more interesting question, according to Wolfers, isn't whether the economy is technically expanding. It's whether that growth is actually improving people's lives. And on that front, he's not convinced. "I think the economy as a whole is actually growing somewhat," Wolfers said, but policy choices are making sure those gains don't trickle down to most households.

Trump's 'Anti-Robin Hood' Approach

Wolfers has a colorful term for President Donald Trump's economic policies: "anti-Robin Hood." Instead of taking from the rich to help the poor, these policies do the opposite. He specifically called out tariffs, which hit low-income households harder because they consume a larger share of their paychecks on goods. Tariffs take a "bigger chunk" from people who can least afford it, he explained.

Budget priorities under the Trump administration are equally problematic, according to Wolfers. The administration found ways to cut "things back for low-income folks, except when it comes to taxes," he said. And those tax changes? They're heading in the wrong direction. "The poor are now going to be paying more, and high-income folks are getting all the tax cuts," Wolfers warned.

Other Economists Are Skeptical Too

Wolfers isn't alone in questioning the GDP narrative. David Rosenberg of Rosenberg Research called the headline figures a "fugazi" last week, arguing that government spending is masking serious economic weakness. By his calculations, the "true" growth rate is closer to a disappointing 0.8%.

Peter Berezin of BCA Research raised another eyebrow-raising point on Sunday in a post on X. He noted that "real personal income" from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis showed "zero growth" alongside that impressive 4.3% GDP number. His verdict? "Fishy."

Not everyone is buying the pessimism, though. Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary praised the GDP figures, saying, "On the GDP number alone, this administration has a pretty good scorecard." He acknowledged that inflation and tariff pressures remain challenges, but still gave credit where he felt it was due.

The bottom line: a strong GDP number is nice to have, but if it's not translating into better living standards for most people, it's more of a statistical curiosity than a genuine economic win.

Back to Stock Market News

Economist Wolfers Questions GDP Gains: Trump Policies 'Anti-Robinhood' And May Not Be Reaching Most Americans

MarketDash Editorial Team
4 hours ago
University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers is pumping the brakes on enthusiasm over the 4.3% GDP growth figure from the July-September quarter, arguing that Trump administration policies are blocking most Americans from feeling the benefits of economic expansion.

The GDP Number Looks Great, But There's a Catch

So the economy grew at 4.3% in the third quarter, which sounds fantastic on paper. But University of Michigan economist Justin Wolfers wants everyone to slow their roll before breaking out the champagne. Speaking on MSNBC's "The Weekend Primetime" on Sunday, he cautioned that early GDP estimates are notoriously unreliable and "could get revised away" at any moment.

The more interesting question, according to Wolfers, isn't whether the economy is technically expanding. It's whether that growth is actually improving people's lives. And on that front, he's not convinced. "I think the economy as a whole is actually growing somewhat," Wolfers said, but policy choices are making sure those gains don't trickle down to most households.

Trump's 'Anti-Robin Hood' Approach

Wolfers has a colorful term for President Donald Trump's economic policies: "anti-Robin Hood." Instead of taking from the rich to help the poor, these policies do the opposite. He specifically called out tariffs, which hit low-income households harder because they consume a larger share of their paychecks on goods. Tariffs take a "bigger chunk" from people who can least afford it, he explained.

Budget priorities under the Trump administration are equally problematic, according to Wolfers. The administration found ways to cut "things back for low-income folks, except when it comes to taxes," he said. And those tax changes? They're heading in the wrong direction. "The poor are now going to be paying more, and high-income folks are getting all the tax cuts," Wolfers warned.

Other Economists Are Skeptical Too

Wolfers isn't alone in questioning the GDP narrative. David Rosenberg of Rosenberg Research called the headline figures a "fugazi" last week, arguing that government spending is masking serious economic weakness. By his calculations, the "true" growth rate is closer to a disappointing 0.8%.

Peter Berezin of BCA Research raised another eyebrow-raising point on Sunday in a post on X. He noted that "real personal income" from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis showed "zero growth" alongside that impressive 4.3% GDP number. His verdict? "Fishy."

Not everyone is buying the pessimism, though. Shark Tank investor Kevin O'Leary praised the GDP figures, saying, "On the GDP number alone, this administration has a pretty good scorecard." He acknowledged that inflation and tariff pressures remain challenges, but still gave credit where he felt it was due.

The bottom line: a strong GDP number is nice to have, but if it's not translating into better living standards for most people, it's more of a statistical curiosity than a genuine economic win.