Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) just made things awkward for President Donald Trump, publicly questioning his administration's strike against Venezuela in a series of pointed social media posts.
The Georgia congresswoman, now in her final days in office, raised some eyebrow-raising questions about the logic behind the military action. If this is really about fighting narco-terrorism and saving American lives from deadly drugs, she asked, why aren't we going after Mexican cartels?
Her post on X laid out the contradictions she sees in the administration's approach. Greene pointed out that fentanyl kills more Americans than any other drug, accounting for over 70% of overdose deaths. And that fentanyl? It comes from Mexican cartels using Chinese chemical precursors, trafficked straight across the southern border.
"Mexican cartels are primarily and overwhelmingly responsible for killing Americans with deadly drugs," Greene wrote. "If U.S. military action and regime change in Venezuela was really about saving American lives from deadly drugs then why hasn't the Trump admin taken action against Mexican cartels?"
She didn't stop there. Greene also called out Trump's decision to pardon former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez, who was convicted and sentenced to 45 years for trafficking hundreds of tons of cocaine into America. The irony? Cocaine is Venezuela's primary drug export to the U.S., according to Greene.
Greene, who served three years on the Homeland Security Committee, made clear she supports strong borders and stopping drug trafficking. But she suggested the Venezuela operation has more to do with controlling the country's oil supplies than fighting cartels.
Her frustration extended beyond the strike itself. She criticized U.S. military invasions and foreign war funding generally, arguing that American tax dollars flow overseas while domestic living costs climb higher. Greene ended her commentary with a facepalm emoji after Trump announced the U.S. will "run" Venezuela.
The public rebuke highlights fractures within the Republican party over foreign policy and military intervention. As Greene's congressional career winds down, her willingness to challenge Trump on these issues signals ongoing debates about America's international role versus its domestic priorities.
Her outspokenness may continue shaping political conversations even after she leaves office, particularly as Republicans grapple with competing visions for U.S. foreign policy.