Marketdash
Back to Stock Market News

Goldman Sachs Says Stock Market Looks Bubbly, But Probably Won't Pop Like 1987

MarketDash Editorial Team
1 day ago
Goldman strategists see warning signs in sky-high valuations and concentrated returns, but key differences from past crashes suggest the market isn't as fragile as it looks. Here's what separates today from history's biggest meltdowns.

The Market Looks Scary, But Maybe Not That Scary

Goldman Sachs strategists just dropped a note that's bound to make investors squirm a little. Led by Ben Snider, the team laid out a laundry list of worrying signs: high valuations, extreme concentration in a handful of mega-cap stocks, and strong recent returns that have everyone feeling a bit too comfortable. Sound familiar? It should. These are the same patterns that showed up before some of history's ugliest market crashes—the 1920s bubble, the "Nifty Fifty" collapse in the early 1970s, and the 1987 Black Monday wipeout.

But here's where it gets interesting. Goldman isn't calling for disaster. They're basically saying yes, the market looks stretched, but no, we're probably not about to relive the greatest hits of financial catastrophe. Why? Because several hallmarks of truly overheated markets are conspicuously absent.

What's Missing From This Bubble

Speculative trading remains well below the frenzied levels of 2000 or 2021. Short interest is elevated, meaning plenty of skeptics are still betting against the rally. Equity inflows are muted—investors aren't throwing money at stocks with reckless abandon. IPO activity was relatively modest last year, nothing like the parade of unprofitable companies going public during bubble peaks. Corporate leverage has ticked up, sure, but it's still low compared to historical norms.

Then there's the matter of the big tech giants. Amazon.com (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG) (GOOGL), Meta Inc. (META), and Microsoft (MSFT) have all climbed higher, but their valuations have risen alongside actual earnings estimates. The strategists noted that these mega-cap hyperscalers are trading broadly in line with their near-term earnings—a stark contrast to the late 1990s when valuations completely detached from any semblance of reality.

Risks Still Lurk

That doesn't mean smooth sailing ahead. Goldman flagged potential macro risks that could derail the party, including a slowdown in economic growth or a more hawkish shift in interest rate policy. They consider both scenarios unlikely for now, but warned that the supportive backdrop could weaken later this year as fiscal and monetary tailwinds fade and AI-driven disruption intensifies across industries.

Wall Street Can't Agree on What Comes Next

Goldman's cautious-but-not-catastrophic view sits somewhere in the middle of Wall Street's current debate. Tom Lee, head of research at Fundstrat Global Advisors, has forecasted a significant rise in the S&P 500, though he acknowledges volatility could spike along the way. Lee thinks small caps could be among this year's winners.

Meanwhile, veteran investor and CIO Louis Navellier is waving red flags about the recent "junk rally" in low-quality stocks. His advice? Stop chasing garbage and focus on companies with strong earnings growth as the new financial year gets underway.

How the Market Has Actually Performed

Over the past year, the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (NASDAQ:QQQ) climbed 21.05% while the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSE:VOO) gained 17.51%, according to market data. Not exactly collapsing, but Goldman's point is that what goes up on stretched valuations can come down when the music stops—even if we're not facing an immediate crash.

Back to Stock Market News

Goldman Sachs Says Stock Market Looks Bubbly, But Probably Won't Pop Like 1987

MarketDash Editorial Team
1 day ago
Goldman strategists see warning signs in sky-high valuations and concentrated returns, but key differences from past crashes suggest the market isn't as fragile as it looks. Here's what separates today from history's biggest meltdowns.

The Market Looks Scary, But Maybe Not That Scary

Goldman Sachs strategists just dropped a note that's bound to make investors squirm a little. Led by Ben Snider, the team laid out a laundry list of worrying signs: high valuations, extreme concentration in a handful of mega-cap stocks, and strong recent returns that have everyone feeling a bit too comfortable. Sound familiar? It should. These are the same patterns that showed up before some of history's ugliest market crashes—the 1920s bubble, the "Nifty Fifty" collapse in the early 1970s, and the 1987 Black Monday wipeout.

But here's where it gets interesting. Goldman isn't calling for disaster. They're basically saying yes, the market looks stretched, but no, we're probably not about to relive the greatest hits of financial catastrophe. Why? Because several hallmarks of truly overheated markets are conspicuously absent.

What's Missing From This Bubble

Speculative trading remains well below the frenzied levels of 2000 or 2021. Short interest is elevated, meaning plenty of skeptics are still betting against the rally. Equity inflows are muted—investors aren't throwing money at stocks with reckless abandon. IPO activity was relatively modest last year, nothing like the parade of unprofitable companies going public during bubble peaks. Corporate leverage has ticked up, sure, but it's still low compared to historical norms.

Then there's the matter of the big tech giants. Amazon.com (AMZN), Alphabet (GOOG) (GOOGL), Meta Inc. (META), and Microsoft (MSFT) have all climbed higher, but their valuations have risen alongside actual earnings estimates. The strategists noted that these mega-cap hyperscalers are trading broadly in line with their near-term earnings—a stark contrast to the late 1990s when valuations completely detached from any semblance of reality.

Risks Still Lurk

That doesn't mean smooth sailing ahead. Goldman flagged potential macro risks that could derail the party, including a slowdown in economic growth or a more hawkish shift in interest rate policy. They consider both scenarios unlikely for now, but warned that the supportive backdrop could weaken later this year as fiscal and monetary tailwinds fade and AI-driven disruption intensifies across industries.

Wall Street Can't Agree on What Comes Next

Goldman's cautious-but-not-catastrophic view sits somewhere in the middle of Wall Street's current debate. Tom Lee, head of research at Fundstrat Global Advisors, has forecasted a significant rise in the S&P 500, though he acknowledges volatility could spike along the way. Lee thinks small caps could be among this year's winners.

Meanwhile, veteran investor and CIO Louis Navellier is waving red flags about the recent "junk rally" in low-quality stocks. His advice? Stop chasing garbage and focus on companies with strong earnings growth as the new financial year gets underway.

How the Market Has Actually Performed

Over the past year, the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (NASDAQ:QQQ) climbed 21.05% while the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSE:VOO) gained 17.51%, according to market data. Not exactly collapsing, but Goldman's point is that what goes up on stretched valuations can come down when the music stops—even if we're not facing an immediate crash.

    Goldman Sachs Says Stock Market Looks Bubbly, But Probably Won't Pop Like 1987 - MarketDash News