The Problem With Just Holding Crypto
Here's an uncomfortable truth about cryptocurrency treasury companies: most of them aren't really companies at all. They're just wrappers around digital assets, and Galaxy Digital (GLXY) CEO Mike Novogratz thinks that's a problem.
In a conversation with SkyBridge Capital founder Anthony Scaramucci, Novogratz laid out why these firms will continue trading at steep discounts to their net asset value unless management does something more creative. We're talking 80% to 95% of NAV, which means investors are essentially paying a penalty for the privilege of owning crypto through a stock.
"Remember the guys running those, the CEOs of those DATs, and the boards, their job is shareholder value. So, what I'm feeling pretty comfortable about is you're not going to get shareholder value just by owning the underlying asset," Novogratz explained.
Translation: if you're just sitting on a pile of Bitcoin (BTC) or Avalanche (AVAX), why should anyone pay extra to own shares in your company instead of buying the crypto directly?
The Saylor Exception
Novogratz pointed out that the old playbook worked for exactly two people: Michael Saylor and Tom Lee. For a while, Strategy Inc. (MSTR) managed to get investors so excited that the stock traded at a premium to its Bitcoin holdings. That's the dream scenario where you hype people into bidding up shares and selling them for more than the underlying assets are worth.
"It worked for Michael Saylor. It worked for Tom Lee," Novogratz said. "It worked for nobody else."
And here's the kicker: even Strategy, the world's largest Bitcoin holder, is now trading 86% below the value of its BTC holdings. The premium disappeared, and what's left is a stark reminder that this business model has real limitations.




