President Donald Trump has made it clear: there's a line in the crypto world he won't cross, and Sam Bankman-Fried is on the wrong side of it. Trump told The New York Times he won't pardon the former FTX CEO, who's serving 25 years for fraud and conspiracy. This matters because Trump has been surprisingly generous with clemency for other crypto entrepreneurs.
The Lobbying Campaign That Went Nowhere
SBF's parents didn't go down without a fight. Barbara Fried and Joseph Bankman, both former Stanford Law School professors, reportedly met with lawyers and others in Trump's orbit trying to secure a pardon. The effort failed spectacularly.
Bankman-Fried himself tried a different approach, conducting what can only be described as a Republican-friendly media rehabilitation tour in recent months. He repeatedly praised Trump's pardon of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández, who was convicted of cocaine importation. The strategy was transparent, and it didn't work.
The political baggage probably didn't help. Bankman-Fried donated $5.2 million to Biden's campaign in 2020, which creates awkward optics for a Trump pardon regardless of SBF's recent pivot. He's currently appealing his conviction from Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where he's reportedly housed in the same dormitory as rapper Sean "Diddy" Combs, who also won't be receiving clemency anytime soon.
The Crypto Figures Who Did Get Pardoned
Trump's rejection of SBF looks particularly striking when you consider who did receive pardons. In January 2025, Trump freed Ross Ulbricht, the Silk Road founder who served over a decade for facilitating $1 billion in illegal drug transactions. Ulbricht's case had become a cause célèbre among libertarians who viewed his sentence as excessively harsh.
In March, Trump pardoned BitMEX co-founders Arthur Hayes, Benjamin Delo, Samuel Reed, and Gregory Dwyer, who had violated anti-money laundering laws.
The most controversial pardon came in October when Trump freed Binance (BNB) founder Changpeng "CZ" Zhao, who had pleaded guilty to enabling money laundering and paid $50 million in fines. Critics including Congresswoman Maxine Waters and Senator Elizabeth Warren alleged corruption, pointing out that Binance invested $2 billion in Trump's World Liberty Financial project. That investment potentially generates $48-52 million annually for Trump's family. Binance also spent $800,000 lobbying for clemency, though CZ denied any quid pro quo arrangement.
Why SBF Is Different
The distinction appears to center on the nature of the crimes and the resulting harm. Ulbricht's Silk Road facilitated illegal transactions, but he wasn't directly stealing from users. The BitMEX founders faced regulatory violations rather than customer fraud. CZ's Binance case involved regulatory failures, but not direct theft from customer accounts.
SBF's FTX collapse tells a different story entirely. The company's implosion resulted in $8 billion in customer losses through fraud and misappropriation of funds. That's not a regulatory technicality or facilitating someone else's crime. That's taking customer money and losing it through risky bets and outright theft.
Trump defended his pro-crypto stance in the Times interview, saying it helped him win votes and that he has "come to like crypto." Trump is a major political backer of Bitcoin (BTC) and digital assets more broadly. The comment suggests he views the crypto industry as politically valuable, but there's apparently a bright line: he won't extend that support to figures convicted of stealing customer money.
The political calculation makes sense too. Pardoning SBF would mean pardoning someone who gave millions to Democrats, which could trigger backlash among Trump's base despite SBF's recent Republican outreach efforts. When you combine the scale of customer losses with the political complications, it's not hard to see why Trump decided this was one pardon he couldn't justify.