Marketdash
Back to Stock Market News

Supreme Court Leaves Trump Tariffs Standing For Now As Polymarket Bets Against Administration

MarketDash Editorial Team
2 days ago
Friday came and went without a Supreme Court ruling on Trump's global tariffs, even as prediction markets give the administration just a 25% chance of winning. With $150 billion in refunds on the line, major corporations are already filing protective lawsuits.

Get Market Alerts

Weekly insights + SMS alerts

If you were hoping for clarity on President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff program, Friday was not your day. The Supreme Court declined to issue a ruling on the controversial duties, leaving corporations, traders, and customs brokers in limbo. Meanwhile, prediction markets are telling a different story than the administration might like.

The Betting Markets Aren't Optimistic

On Polymarket, traders are giving Trump only a 25% chance of winning the tariff case at the Supreme Court. That's a 75% implied probability that the justices will side with lower courts that already found Trump exceeded his authority. The court hasn't announced when it will decide, which means the uncertainty continues.

The legal controversy centers on Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 law designed for actual national emergencies. Trump invoked IEEPA to impose "reciprocal" tariffs on goods from nearly every foreign trading partner, declaring trade deficits themselves a national emergency. He used the same law for separate duties on China, Canada, and Mexico, this time citing fentanyl trafficking as the justification.

Lower courts weren't buying it. They ruled Trump exceeded his authority by stretching emergency powers to cover what looks a lot like standard trade policy. The administration appealed, and here we are.

The $150 Billion Question

Here's where things get expensive. If the Supreme Court strikes down the tariffs, companies that paid duties under protest could be entitled to refunds. We're talking about $150 billion in potential refunds from the U.S. government. That's not a rounding error.

The list of companies that have already filed lawsuits reads like a who's who of corporate America. Costco Wholesale Corp. (COST), Alcoa Corp. (AA), EssilorLuxottica SA (EL), Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (GT), BorgWarner Inc. (BWA), and GoPro Inc. (GPRO) are among the major players challenging the tariffs and seeking refunds. Revlon Inc. is in the mix too.

More recently, Dole Fresh Fruit Company filed on January 2, seeking a declaration that the IEEPA tariffs were unlawful, a full refund for all tariffs paid, and an injunction preventing future tariffs. J.Crew Group filed January 6 with similar demands.

Toyota subsidiaries, Bumble Bee Foods, Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing, Yokohama Tire, and Yamazaki Mazak have also filed what lawyers call "protective suits" to preserve their refund rights just in case the court rules against the administration.

Why Crypto Traders Are Watching This Closely

Interestingly, crypto traders have decided that a tariff loss for Trump would be bullish for Bitcoin (BTC) and other risk assets. Their logic goes something like this: striking down the tariffs would remove a massive source of uncertainty from markets. With over $130 billion in annual tariff revenue suddenly facing legal challenge, corporations would see cost pressures ease and earnings outlooks improve.

That improved clarity, the theory goes, would allow capital to flow back into growth assets like Bitcoin and tech stocks. It's the classic risk-on trade, except triggered by a legal defeat rather than a policy victory.

Trump himself seems to understand what's at stake. In a January 2 social media post, he said a Supreme Court ruling against the tariffs would be a "terrible blow" to the United States. He's argued that tariffs have made the country financially stronger.

Don't Expect A Clean Resolution

Even if the Supreme Court strikes down tariffs imposed under IEEPA, the reality will be messier than a simple win or loss. Other duties imposed under different statutes would remain in force. Any rollback would likely be partial, slow, and complicated rather than an immediate removal of all trade barriers.

This case represents a major test of presidential powers and how far the courts are willing to let Trump push the boundaries of executive authority. The outcome will ripple through the global economy in ways that extend far beyond Bitcoin price action. For now, though, we wait. And Polymarket traders are betting the administration won't like the answer when it finally comes.

Back to Stock Market News

Supreme Court Leaves Trump Tariffs Standing For Now As Polymarket Bets Against Administration

MarketDash Editorial Team
2 days ago
Friday came and went without a Supreme Court ruling on Trump's global tariffs, even as prediction markets give the administration just a 25% chance of winning. With $150 billion in refunds on the line, major corporations are already filing protective lawsuits.

Get Market Alerts

Weekly insights + SMS alerts

If you were hoping for clarity on President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff program, Friday was not your day. The Supreme Court declined to issue a ruling on the controversial duties, leaving corporations, traders, and customs brokers in limbo. Meanwhile, prediction markets are telling a different story than the administration might like.

The Betting Markets Aren't Optimistic

On Polymarket, traders are giving Trump only a 25% chance of winning the tariff case at the Supreme Court. That's a 75% implied probability that the justices will side with lower courts that already found Trump exceeded his authority. The court hasn't announced when it will decide, which means the uncertainty continues.

The legal controversy centers on Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, a 1977 law designed for actual national emergencies. Trump invoked IEEPA to impose "reciprocal" tariffs on goods from nearly every foreign trading partner, declaring trade deficits themselves a national emergency. He used the same law for separate duties on China, Canada, and Mexico, this time citing fentanyl trafficking as the justification.

Lower courts weren't buying it. They ruled Trump exceeded his authority by stretching emergency powers to cover what looks a lot like standard trade policy. The administration appealed, and here we are.

The $150 Billion Question

Here's where things get expensive. If the Supreme Court strikes down the tariffs, companies that paid duties under protest could be entitled to refunds. We're talking about $150 billion in potential refunds from the U.S. government. That's not a rounding error.

The list of companies that have already filed lawsuits reads like a who's who of corporate America. Costco Wholesale Corp. (COST), Alcoa Corp. (AA), EssilorLuxottica SA (EL), Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (GT), BorgWarner Inc. (BWA), and GoPro Inc. (GPRO) are among the major players challenging the tariffs and seeking refunds. Revlon Inc. is in the mix too.

More recently, Dole Fresh Fruit Company filed on January 2, seeking a declaration that the IEEPA tariffs were unlawful, a full refund for all tariffs paid, and an injunction preventing future tariffs. J.Crew Group filed January 6 with similar demands.

Toyota subsidiaries, Bumble Bee Foods, Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing, Yokohama Tire, and Yamazaki Mazak have also filed what lawyers call "protective suits" to preserve their refund rights just in case the court rules against the administration.

Why Crypto Traders Are Watching This Closely

Interestingly, crypto traders have decided that a tariff loss for Trump would be bullish for Bitcoin (BTC) and other risk assets. Their logic goes something like this: striking down the tariffs would remove a massive source of uncertainty from markets. With over $130 billion in annual tariff revenue suddenly facing legal challenge, corporations would see cost pressures ease and earnings outlooks improve.

That improved clarity, the theory goes, would allow capital to flow back into growth assets like Bitcoin and tech stocks. It's the classic risk-on trade, except triggered by a legal defeat rather than a policy victory.

Trump himself seems to understand what's at stake. In a January 2 social media post, he said a Supreme Court ruling against the tariffs would be a "terrible blow" to the United States. He's argued that tariffs have made the country financially stronger.

Don't Expect A Clean Resolution

Even if the Supreme Court strikes down tariffs imposed under IEEPA, the reality will be messier than a simple win or loss. Other duties imposed under different statutes would remain in force. Any rollback would likely be partial, slow, and complicated rather than an immediate removal of all trade barriers.

This case represents a major test of presidential powers and how far the courts are willing to let Trump push the boundaries of executive authority. The outcome will ripple through the global economy in ways that extend far beyond Bitcoin price action. For now, though, we wait. And Polymarket traders are betting the administration won't like the answer when it finally comes.