Marketdash
Back to Stock Market News

The ETF Market Is Getting Picky: Why Amazon and AI Winners Are Splitting 2026 Strategies

MarketDash Editorial Team
3 hours ago
As investors zero in on clear winners rather than broad market bets, Amazon's multi-engine growth and AI-enabled software companies are reshaping ETF portfolios in 2026, while consumer spending splits along income lines.

Get Market Alerts

Weekly insights + SMS alerts

The ETF world is getting selective in 2026, and it's not hard to see why. Artificial intelligence is moving from hype to actual deployment, consumer spending is splitting along income lines, and investors are done pretending every company in a sector deserves equal treatment. The broad-market bet is losing appeal. Picking winners matters again.

Amazon Is Doing Everything Right (Even When It Looks Wrong)

Take Amazon (AMZN), which has become something of a litmus test for whether you understand how great companies actually work. According to Eric Clark, portfolio manager of the Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and chief information officer at Accuvest Global Advisors, investors keep fixating on Amazon's capital spending like it's some kind of red flag.

"People love to just point to the capex spend, but that spending is happening at Microsoft. It's happening at Meta," Clark said. "It's very odd, because Amazon in particular has a history of spending free cash flow when they have it for good ROI growth."

That's the point everyone seems to miss. Amazon isn't just burning cash for the sake of it. The company is firing on all cylinders across retail, advertising, and AWS, and that multi-engine momentum is exactly why it remains a heavyweight in consumer and tech-focused ETFs. Think mega-cap funds and cloud-centric portfolios like the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and the Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU).

When a company can grow in three major directions at once while everyone else is trying to figure out one, it tends to show up in a lot of ETF portfolios.

The AI Story Is About Deployment, Not Just Potential

Software is where things get interesting. Clark argues the market has already priced in a lot of AI optimism broadly, but it hasn't properly rewarded the companies actually using the technology across their entire operations. There's a difference between talking about AI and embedding it into every layer of your business.

"...if you're demonstrating strong capabilities that allow AI to be deployed across the workforce and throughout all divisions, there's significant benefit to be gained," he said, pointing to ServiceNow Inc (NOW), Intuit Inc (INTU), and Salesforce Inc (CRM) as prime examples.

Active ETFs like LOGO are positioning around this dispersion, going after software names that enable AI deployment while steering clear of companies at risk of getting disrupted by the very same technology. It's a bet on the builders, not the talkers.

Consumer Spending Is Splitting Down the Middle

On the consumer side, the story is less about AI and more about who has money to spend. Clark noted that U.S. spending is dividing along a familiar pattern: the wealthy are doing fine, and everyone else is feeling the squeeze.

"The upper part of the K, the higher income, with real assets and homes, they're doing pretty well, and they're spending really well," he said. "The small, the lower income cohorts, are struggling, because inflation is still present in a lot of parts of our lives."

That split is showing up in ETF strategies. Value-focused retailers like Walmart Inc (WMT) and Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) are getting attention in funds like the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and VanEck Retail ETF (RTH), while consumer staples ETFs such as the Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) offer exposure to defensive segments without betting on broad discretionary strength.

Clark also flagged credit usage as a key indicator, noting that consumers are "using credit to fill the gap" in higher-price categories. That's not exactly a sign of strength, and it's making ETF managers more careful about which consumer names they want to own.

Employment Holds the Keys

At the end of the day, employment conditions remain the ultimate driver of discretionary spending. If people have jobs, they spend. If they don't, they pull back. It's simple, but it matters more than ever in a market where the gap between winners and losers is widening.

ETFs are increasingly taking sides in this environment. The days of owning everything in a sector and hoping for the best are fading. Investors want exposure to companies with clear advantages, whether that's Amazon's triple-threat business model, software firms deploying AI at scale, or retailers serving the right income cohorts. The market is sorting itself out, and ETF strategies are following suit.

Back to Stock Market News

The ETF Market Is Getting Picky: Why Amazon and AI Winners Are Splitting 2026 Strategies

MarketDash Editorial Team
3 hours ago
As investors zero in on clear winners rather than broad market bets, Amazon's multi-engine growth and AI-enabled software companies are reshaping ETF portfolios in 2026, while consumer spending splits along income lines.

Get Market Alerts

Weekly insights + SMS alerts

The ETF world is getting selective in 2026, and it's not hard to see why. Artificial intelligence is moving from hype to actual deployment, consumer spending is splitting along income lines, and investors are done pretending every company in a sector deserves equal treatment. The broad-market bet is losing appeal. Picking winners matters again.

Amazon Is Doing Everything Right (Even When It Looks Wrong)

Take Amazon (AMZN), which has become something of a litmus test for whether you understand how great companies actually work. According to Eric Clark, portfolio manager of the Alpha Brands Consumption Leaders ETF (LOGO) and chief information officer at Accuvest Global Advisors, investors keep fixating on Amazon's capital spending like it's some kind of red flag.

"People love to just point to the capex spend, but that spending is happening at Microsoft. It's happening at Meta," Clark said. "It's very odd, because Amazon in particular has a history of spending free cash flow when they have it for good ROI growth."

That's the point everyone seems to miss. Amazon isn't just burning cash for the sake of it. The company is firing on all cylinders across retail, advertising, and AWS, and that multi-engine momentum is exactly why it remains a heavyweight in consumer and tech-focused ETFs. Think mega-cap funds and cloud-centric portfolios like the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) and the Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU).

When a company can grow in three major directions at once while everyone else is trying to figure out one, it tends to show up in a lot of ETF portfolios.

The AI Story Is About Deployment, Not Just Potential

Software is where things get interesting. Clark argues the market has already priced in a lot of AI optimism broadly, but it hasn't properly rewarded the companies actually using the technology across their entire operations. There's a difference between talking about AI and embedding it into every layer of your business.

"...if you're demonstrating strong capabilities that allow AI to be deployed across the workforce and throughout all divisions, there's significant benefit to be gained," he said, pointing to ServiceNow Inc (NOW), Intuit Inc (INTU), and Salesforce Inc (CRM) as prime examples.

Active ETFs like LOGO are positioning around this dispersion, going after software names that enable AI deployment while steering clear of companies at risk of getting disrupted by the very same technology. It's a bet on the builders, not the talkers.

Consumer Spending Is Splitting Down the Middle

On the consumer side, the story is less about AI and more about who has money to spend. Clark noted that U.S. spending is dividing along a familiar pattern: the wealthy are doing fine, and everyone else is feeling the squeeze.

"The upper part of the K, the higher income, with real assets and homes, they're doing pretty well, and they're spending really well," he said. "The small, the lower income cohorts, are struggling, because inflation is still present in a lot of parts of our lives."

That split is showing up in ETF strategies. Value-focused retailers like Walmart Inc (WMT) and Costco Wholesale Corp (COST) are getting attention in funds like the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) and VanEck Retail ETF (RTH), while consumer staples ETFs such as the Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) offer exposure to defensive segments without betting on broad discretionary strength.

Clark also flagged credit usage as a key indicator, noting that consumers are "using credit to fill the gap" in higher-price categories. That's not exactly a sign of strength, and it's making ETF managers more careful about which consumer names they want to own.

Employment Holds the Keys

At the end of the day, employment conditions remain the ultimate driver of discretionary spending. If people have jobs, they spend. If they don't, they pull back. It's simple, but it matters more than ever in a market where the gap between winners and losers is widening.

ETFs are increasingly taking sides in this environment. The days of owning everything in a sector and hoping for the best are fading. Investors want exposure to companies with clear advantages, whether that's Amazon's triple-threat business model, software firms deploying AI at scale, or retailers serving the right income cohorts. The market is sorting itself out, and ETF strategies are following suit.