A Flawless Operation With Questionable Numbers

President Donald Trump isn't shy about celebrating wins, and he certainly wasn't holding back at the Detroit Economic Club on Tuesday. Speaking about the recent U.S. military operation in Venezuela that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, Trump declared it "as flawless as an attack as there has ever been."

But it was his claims about the aftermath that raised eyebrows. Trump said the U.S. is now "taking in millions and millions of barrels of oil" from Venezuela. On a "daily basis," he claimed, America is receiving "50 million barrels," which he predicted would "bring oil prices down further."

"Winning is a good thing," Trump added, promising his administration would work with Venezuela to "make that country strong again." He tied the Venezuela operation into his broader narrative about the American economy experiencing a historic boom, pointing to rising investments and record stock market levels driven by his tariff policies.

When the Numbers Don't Make Sense

Here's where things get tricky. Trump's figure of 50 million barrels per day appears wildly implausible when you look at actual global oil production data. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, total worldwide crude oil production averaged about 106.3 million barrels per day in 2025. That means Trump is claiming a single country is supplying nearly half of all oil produced on the planet daily.

Venezuela's own production history makes this even more questionable. The country's peak oil output occurred in the early 2000s at just 3 million barrels per day. By late 2025, that figure had collapsed to around 950,000 barrels per day. So we're talking about a nation that currently produces less than 1 million barrels daily supposedly delivering 50 million.

Last week, Trump offered a different version of events, claiming Venezuela would turn over "anywhere between 30 and 50 million barrels of oil" to the U.S. in what appeared to be a one-time transfer, not a daily shipment. He said he would control the proceeds from this oil to "benefit the people of Venezuela and the United States."

Reality Check From Experts and Industry

The skepticism from experts has been swift and blunt. Economist Paul Krugman said last week that "whatever it is we're doing in Venezuela isn't really a war for oil" but rather a war for "oil fantasies."

Krugman pointed out that current oil prices are relatively low by historical standards, while Venezuela's extra heavy crude has a breakeven price of "more than $80" per barrel. His conclusion? Trump's plans for tapping the nation's vast energy reserves "would be an unrealistic fantasy."

The energy industry itself isn't exactly jumping at the opportunity either. During a White House meeting last week, Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM) CEO Darren Woods bluntly described Venezuela as currently "uninvestable." His reasoning was straightforward: the Venezuelan government has previously confiscated the company's assets, making it nearly impossible to justify new investments regardless of the country's oil reserves.

Shares of Exxon Mobil rose 2.02% on Tuesday, closing at $126.54, and were up 0.20% in after-hours trading. The stock currently shows weak performance on momentum and growth metrics, though it maintains favorable price trends across short, medium, and long-term timeframes.

The gap between Trump's triumphant rhetoric and the practical realities of Venezuelan oil production remains enormous. Whether his administration can bridge that gap or whether this remains in the realm of "oil fantasies" will become clearer in the months ahead.