If you've ever wondered whether that in-flight Wi-Fi is worth the extra fuel it takes to haul the equipment through the sky, SpaceX has some reassuring numbers for you. According to Michael Nicolls, VP of Starlink Engineering at Elon Musk's SpaceX, the company's satellite terminals add just 0.3% to an aircraft's fuel consumption. That's significantly better than the legacy systems they're replacing.
The Fuel Efficiency Debate
The conversation started on Wednesday when Nicolls responded to a post on X from influencer Sawyer Merritt. Merritt had highlighted the difference in antenna sizes after Irish carrier Ryanair Holdings PLC (RYAAY) decided to pass on offering Starlink, citing concerns about fuel costs. Ryanair apparently wasn't convinced the trade-off was worth it.
Here's where the numbers get interesting. Nicolls explained that older satellite terminals typically increase fuel consumption by about 2%, thanks to their bulkier, less aerodynamic designs. Starlink's terminals, by contrast, are "much lower profile and more efficient." The company's research shows that on a Boeing Co. (BA) 787-800 aircraft, Starlink adds only 0.3% to fuel burn. And as Nicolls pointed out, passengers actually want connectivity when they fly—so that modest trade-off seems reasonable.
Musk Pushes for Even Better
Never one to settle, Musk jumped into the thread with his own thoughts. "Must be a way to get that down under 0.1%," the billionaire wrote. He's apparently eyeing future design tweaks that could make the drag created by these terminals almost negligible. When you're Elon Musk, 0.3% is just the starting point.




