Here's something that hasn't happened since the Nixon administration: more people are leaving the United States than entering it. According to a Brookings Institution report released Monday, America just experienced negative net migration for the first time in half a century, driven largely by President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration enforcement.

The numbers tell the story. Brookings estimates net migration flows somewhere between negative 295,000 and negative 10,000 for 2025. That's a dramatic reversal for a country built on immigration. The shift stems from fewer people entering the country combined with increased removals and voluntary departures.

Interestingly, Brookings pegs actual removals at 310,000 to 315,000 this year, considerably lower than the administration's headline claim of more than 600,000 deportations. The difference matters when you're trying to understand what's actually happening on the ground.

Economic Fallout Coming Into Focus

The report points to several factors driving the reversal: stricter enforcement leading to deportations and self-deportations, suspended humanitarian programs, and a steep drop in temporary visa issuances. And the economic consequences could be substantial.

Brookings predicts the migration losses will trigger "unexpectedly weak economic activity" in sectors that serve immigrant communities. We're talking weakened employment, slower GDP growth, and consumer spending declines between $60 billion and $110 billion. Those aren't trivial numbers.

The situation is expected to intensify in 2026 as funding from Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act kicks in, potentially driving removals even higher.

Visa Pause Expands Reach

The crackdown continued this week when the State Department paused immigrant visa issuance for citizens of 75 countries, citing concerns about future reliance on public assistance. The list includes Nepal, Sudan, Somalia, Iran, Haiti, Bangladesh, and Eritrea, among others.

The administration has consistently defended its immigration stance, arguing the policies "save lives" and reduce violent crime. But the economic trade-offs are becoming harder to ignore. JPMorgan recently forecast a sluggish job market in 2026, pointing to both trade uncertainty and restrictive immigration policies as key drags on growth.

Whether you view this as necessary enforcement or economic self-sabotage probably depends on where you sit politically. Either way, the era of reliably positive net migration in America appears to be on pause.